The applicant submits a lawyer contract dated 24   September 2021, signed both by the applicant and the lawyer, which indicates the applicant will pay EUR 1,000 to the lawyer for his representation

Matijević, a lawyer practising in Osijek; the decision to give notice of the applicants’ complaint that they were unable to effectively participate in the criminal proceedings in which their property was

Davidovikj, a lawyer practising in Skopje; the decision to give notice of the applicant’s complaints concerning his conviction in absentia , the related prison sentence and the impossibility of a retrial

Ont été entendus au cours de l'audience publique : - le rapport de Mme Pauline Hascoët, - les conclusions de M.

18 Abdullah SAÇAK against Türkiye   The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 30   August 2022 as a Committee composed of:   Egidijus Kūris , President,   Pauliine

Bollecker, a lawyer practising in Strasbourg.

Babaka Alima LOMBAYA contre la Belgique La Cour européenne des droits de l’homme (deuxième section), siégeant le 12 mars 2024 en un comité composé de   :   Egidijus Kūris , président ,   Pauliine

The applicant was not present at the hearing held by the Court of Appeal, but he was represented by a lawyer. 11 .

  Kahraman, a lawyer practising in Istanbul. 2.

    No litigant should be prevented from being assisted by a lawyer.

Selçuk, lawyers practising in Istanbul. 3.

Bagdonaitė-Zarembienė, a lawyer practising in Vilnius; the decision to give notice of the complaint concerning Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention to the Lithuanian Government (“the Government

He then called his lawyer and told the police that he would not sign his statement. On the same day the first applicant and one H.D. recognized N.Ž. as the man who had most probably shot H.K. 6.

  Bitaris, a lawyer practising in Klaipėda; the decision to give notice of the complaint, under Article 5 § 1 of the Convention, concerning lawfulness of the applicant’s deprivation of liberty to

  Głuszek-Manikowska, a lawyer practising in Bydgoszcz. A.     The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.

The applicants are represented by Olga Pavlovna Tseytlina, a lawyer practising in St   Petersburg. The applicants are a single mother and her son.

60956/12 Lorenc BEGAJ against Albania The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 18   October 2016 as a Committee composed of:   Kristina Pardalos, President,   Pauliine

see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 21   January 2021 as a Committee composed of:   Branko Lubarda, President,   Carlo Ranzoni,   Pauliine

Ljube BOSHKOSKI against North Macedonia   The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 20   October 2020 as a Committee composed of:   Aleš Pejchal, President,   Pauliine