CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

927 résultats pour « Privitello »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0510DEC003310415

Admin. suprême

10 mai 2022

10 mai 2022

According to section 4 of the regulation, only privately-owned operators, which had been granted licences previously for a nationwide coverage of territory (“national broadcasters”), were invited to participate

Page 16 sur 47

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0911DEC005154722

Admin. suprême

11 septembre 2025

11 septembre 2025

    The case has its origin in the publication on G., a privately operated web page associated with a news portal, of what was purported to be an   extract from such a database, featuring

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0425DEC004713606

Admin. suprême

25 avril 2017

25 avril 2017

  On 20 September 2007 the Seferihisar Civil Court of First Instance dismissed the applicant’s claim on the ground that the land had been part of the public forest area and could thus not be privately

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-173022

Admin. suprême

23 mars 2017

23 mars 2017

February 2011 and for the other acts and decisions of that authority in the present cases, and did that authority have competence under domestic law to take decisions resulting in the expropriation of privately-owned

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0217DEC003289707

Admin. suprême

17 février 2015

17 février 2015

It operated as a joint stock company until 2007, when it was split into two companies: one being privately owned and the other being State-owned. 8.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0615DEC002793705

Admin. suprême

15 juin 2010

15 juin 2010

In a final decision of 6   March 2006 the Supreme Court of Cassation rejected the complaint as inadmissible, reasoning that the offence allegedly committed by the expert was not a privately prosecutable

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0120DEC003956198

Admin. suprême

20 janvier 2004

20 janvier 2004

Denham aerodrome is a privately owned and operated aerodrome, most of which lies within the London Control Zone. 110 full-time and 45 part-time employees, of various companies, work there.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0112JUD004831418

Admin. suprême

12 janvier 2021

12 janvier 2021

She submitted, inter alia , that the arbiter had not been independent and impartial because, during the examination of the case, he had privately met with G.B., the lawyer of company A.G.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1006DEC002369303

Admin. suprême

6 octobre 2005

6 octobre 2005

submission, the applicant indicated that the investigator invited a State-appointed lawyer but he refused the lawyer's services, since he did not want to have anything to do with either State-appointed or privately

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0831JUD003770617

Admin. suprême

31 août 2023

31 août 2023

    The Court has previously held in cases against Azerbaijan that the BCEA did not have any authority to expropriate privately-owned property (see Akhverdiyev , § 92, and Khalikova , § 138,

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0707DEC003032013

Admin. suprême

7 juillet 2020

7 juillet 2020

    Relying on the privately commissioned report (see paragraph 7 above), on 8 July 2010 the applicants requested an environmental health inspection of the bar.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-109770

Admin. suprême

8 mars 2012

8 mars 2012

The Court does not accept the applicants’ argument that this new remedy is purely theoretical" (decision in the case of Société Provitel St ‑ Georges and J.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-201676

Admin. suprême

10 février 2020

10 février 2020

It noted that making insults and threats were privately prosecutable offences (see paragraph 41 below), and that there was no evidence that Mr V had breached the terms of a protection order contrary to

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0309DEC003501607

Admin. suprême

9 mars 2010

9 mars 2010

[The applicant] has submitted a privately performed DNA test according to which he cannot be the father of A.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0323DEC007658101

Admin. suprême

23 mars 2006

23 mars 2006

Article 63   (2) guarantees to all inhabitants of Austria the right to manifest publicly and privately their thought, religion and belief, unless it is incompatible with the protection of public order

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1102JUD005624715

Admin. suprême

2 novembre 2023

2 novembre 2023

  38004/12, §§   145-50 and 166-72, 17 July 2018, concerning inability to communicate freely and   privately with   a lawyer during the trial; Andrey Smirnov v. Russia , no.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1214JUD001356713

Admin. suprême

14 décembre 2023

14 décembre 2023

CHEBOTAREV 1984       Supreme Court of the Republic of Komi 23/06/2014 Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (b) and (c) – unfair criminal proceedings in view of the   lack of a possibility to confer privately

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0607DEC002178308

Admin. suprême

7 juin 2011

7 juin 2011

The Tribunal noted that the report failed to indicate the importance of the drug to the applicant’s health; whether it was available privately; whether alternatives would suffice; and whether it was also

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0217JUD001063722

Admin. suprême

17 février 2026

17 février 2026

    On 17 August 2016 the Sofia District Prosecutor refused to open criminal proceedings, considering the offence privately prosecutable. The applicant was not notified of that refusal. 4 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0629DEC002055192

Admin. suprême

29 juin 1994

29 juin 1994

  The Court further found that the applicant had not been prevented from producing evidence on the same circumstances by other means such as witnesses, documents or a privately ordered expert opinion

Source officielle