CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0510DEC003310415
10 mai 2022
According to section 4 of the regulation, only privately-owned operators, which had been granted licences previously for a nationwide coverage of territory (“national broadcasters”), were invited to participate
Page 16 sur 47
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0911DEC005154722
11 septembre 2025
The case has its origin in the publication on G., a privately operated web page associated with a news portal, of what was purported to be an extract from such a database, featuring
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0425DEC004713606
25 avril 2017
On 20 September 2007 the Seferihisar Civil Court of First Instance dismissed the applicant’s claim on the ground that the land had been part of the public forest area and could thus not be privately
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-173022
23 mars 2017
February 2011 and for the other acts and decisions of that authority in the present cases, and did that authority have competence under domestic law to take decisions resulting in the expropriation of privately-owned
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0217DEC003289707
17 février 2015
It operated as a joint stock company until 2007, when it was split into two companies: one being privately owned and the other being State-owned. 8.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0615DEC002793705
15 juin 2010
In a final decision of 6 March 2006 the Supreme Court of Cassation rejected the complaint as inadmissible, reasoning that the offence allegedly committed by the expert was not a privately prosecutable
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0120DEC003956198
20 janvier 2004
Denham aerodrome is a privately owned and operated aerodrome, most of which lies within the London Control Zone. 110 full-time and 45 part-time employees, of various companies, work there.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0112JUD004831418
12 janvier 2021
She submitted, inter alia , that the arbiter had not been independent and impartial because, during the examination of the case, he had privately met with G.B., the lawyer of company A.G.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1006DEC002369303
6 octobre 2005
submission, the applicant indicated that the investigator invited a State-appointed lawyer but he refused the lawyer's services, since he did not want to have anything to do with either State-appointed or privately
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0831JUD003770617
31 août 2023
The Court has previously held in cases against Azerbaijan that the BCEA did not have any authority to expropriate privately-owned property (see Akhverdiyev , § 92, and Khalikova , § 138,
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0707DEC003032013
7 juillet 2020
Relying on the privately commissioned report (see paragraph 7 above), on 8 July 2010 the applicants requested an environmental health inspection of the bar.
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-109770
8 mars 2012
The Court does not accept the applicants’ argument that this new remedy is purely theoretical" (decision in the case of Société Provitel St ‑ Georges and J.
ECLI:CEDH:001-201676
10 février 2020
It noted that making insults and threats were privately prosecutable offences (see paragraph 41 below), and that there was no evidence that Mr V had breached the terms of a protection order contrary to
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0309DEC003501607
9 mars 2010
[The applicant] has submitted a privately performed DNA test according to which he cannot be the father of A.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0323DEC007658101
23 mars 2006
Article 63 (2) guarantees to all inhabitants of Austria the right to manifest publicly and privately their thought, religion and belief, unless it is incompatible with the protection of public order
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1102JUD005624715
2 novembre 2023
38004/12, §§ 145-50 and 166-72, 17 July 2018, concerning inability to communicate freely and privately with a lawyer during the trial; Andrey Smirnov v. Russia , no.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1214JUD001356713
14 décembre 2023
CHEBOTAREV 1984 Supreme Court of the Republic of Komi 23/06/2014 Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (b) and (c) – unfair criminal proceedings in view of the lack of a possibility to confer privately
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0607DEC002178308
7 juin 2011
The Tribunal noted that the report failed to indicate the importance of the drug to the applicant’s health; whether it was available privately; whether alternatives would suffice; and whether it was also
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0217JUD001063722
17 février 2026
On 17 August 2016 the Sofia District Prosecutor refused to open criminal proceedings, considering the offence privately prosecutable. The applicant was not notified of that refusal. 4 .
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0629DEC002055192
29 juin 1994
The Court further found that the applicant had not been prevented from producing evidence on the same circumstances by other means such as witnesses, documents or a privately ordered expert opinion