CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0308DEC002968809
8 mars 2016
Had they done so, they would have appreciated the consequences which their actions would entail. Instead, it was obvious that they had been indifferent to this fact. 35.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0119DEC003823309
19 janvier 2010
It found that, irrespective of the family’s credibility, if they had been exposed to criminal acts in Serbia then this should be dealt with by the national authorities.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0621DEC005066499
21 juin 2005
The Court first finds that Article 6 § 1 of the Convention applies to the tax assessment proceedings in the case in so far as they concerned the tax surcharge, as in this respect they involved a determination
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-12968
13 octobre 2020
They had thus been treated in the same manner as Romanian pupils sitting it, even though their situation had been different.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0516DEC000988605
16 mai 2006
They consider that the final domestic decision for the purposes of this rule was the District Court’s judgment of 29   December   1995.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0112JUD005216013
12 janvier 2016
Thus, they did not fulfil the eligibility criteria for either refugee status or subsidiary protection. 16.
ECLI:CEDH:002-226
12 janvier 1999
The applicant himself had thus obtained Russian citizenship by birth.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-145894
30 juin 2014
Thus, the daughters had already stated on 11 June 2010 that they preferred living with their father.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0927DEC003999719
27 septembre 2022
The Court finds this explanation acceptable and is thus satisfied that in the present case there were exceptional circumstances that dispensed the Government from the obligation to raise their objection
ECLI:CEDH:002-11815
18 janvier 2018
It thus had the legitimate aim of protecting “the rights and freedoms of others”.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0930DEC002980410
30 septembre 2014
Neither are they entitled to usurp the function of this Court as happened here.” 19.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0925DEC004548313
25 septembre 2018
The court had had no reason to invite the applicants to do that, as they had set out the overall value of the subject matter of the legal action at the beginning of the proceedings and thus the court had
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1208DEC002946004
8 décembre 2009
They also submitted that the “reserve” still existed on their property. They did not comment on the Government’s submissions as regards the alleged failure to comply with the six-month rule. 2.
ECLI:CEDH:002-8905
27 août 1997
against abuse – there were thus relevant and sufficient reasons for the communication of the applicant's medical records by the clinic to the Office; the measure was not disproportionate to the legitimate
ECLI:CEDH:002-13412
7 septembre 2021
Indeed, the Supreme Court’s decision in the fifth applicant’s case corroborated this assessment.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0929JUD004910219
29 septembre 2022
Those considerations suffice to find that the redress provided did not offer sufficient relief to the applicants, who thus retain victim status for the purposes of this complaint (see, mutatis mutandis
ECLI:CEDH:002-7659
4 juin 2009
The applicants, who were thus required to choose between the two pensions, unsuccessfully challenged this decision before the Estonian courts.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1970:0721DEC000395969
21 juillet 1970
As regards the stomach disease, the Agency stated that this had already been cured.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0702DEC000913009
2 juillet 2013
They refused to acknowledge it and demanded a permit from the “TRNC” authorities. All protests in this regard were disregarded.
ECLI:CEDH:001-116006
20 décembre 2012
The applicants argue that the State thus puts at risk the health and even the lives of future mothers and babies.
Page 16 sur 4857