case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article   34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various

Bogolyubov, whom they had traced to one of the prisons of the Samara Region, had never been detained in the same cell of the same prison in the Samara Region together with the applicant. 42.

Moreover, the various regional notary chambers (of which there are sometimes more than one per region) require different membership fees depending on the decision of the general assembly of members.

On 15 August 2007 the Leningrad Region Court upheld the sentence on appeal. B.     The applicant’s medical treatment and conditions of his detention 10.

The applicant unsuccessfully complained about the conditions of detention in IVS to the head of that facility and various domestic authorities (ombudsman of Tver region and the prosecutor’s office).

    In 2005 to 2006 the applicant was prosecuted for various crimes.

  On 1 December 1997 the governor of the state-of-emergency region prohibited the importing of Ülkede Gündem into the region and its distribution there.

LA COUR DE CASSATION, CHAMBRE SOCIALE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur les pourvois n° H/91-42.920 au n° J/91-42.922, n°91-42.937 et n° C/91-42.939 formés par : 1°/ M. le préfet de la région Lorraine

Hubert X... demeurant résidence des 5 vantons, ... (64600) ; M.

Law – Article 1: The acts allegedly constitutive of violations of the applicants’ various Convention rights had taken place in and around Tskhinvali, the administrative capital of South Ossetia, on 8 and

Serghides, judges, and Fatoş Aracı, Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having deliberated, decides as follows

    The Court notes that the applicants who suffer from various disabilities, were, kept in detention in poor conditions which did not satisfy their special needs.

Vyshgorod District Court of Kyiv Region, 19.06.2008 2.

    The applicants are Russian nationals living in various regions of the Russian Federation. Their personal details appear in the appended table. 2.

case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article   34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various

2) 15 July 2003, Krasniy Luch Town Court of the Luhansk Region 3) 14 June 2005, Krasniy Luch Town Court of the Luhansk Region 4) 19 May 2005, Krasniy Luch Town Court of the Luhansk Region   &#xa0

During different periods between 2012 and 2017 various assistance measures were attempted and further notifications of concern were submitted to the child welfare services.

In October 2002 the applicant was moved to Penitentiary no. 113, a prison with a less strict regime in which, according to the applicant, the food supplied and the living conditions were inadequate; the

  APPENDIX – STATEMENT OF FACTS Application raising complaints under Article 10 §1 of the Convention (various restrictions on the right to freedom of expression) No. Application no.

Romania - 24199/07 Judgment 5.4.2016 [Section IV] Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 Peaceful enjoyment of possessions Facts – Through various international treaties signed