CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

10 526 résultats pour « Bessala »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-231519

Admin. suprême

6 février 2024

6 février 2024

Applicants 1-4 (see the appendix) are the parents of the three above-mentioned men, who brought, on 9 January 2012, the application both in their own name and on behalf of their missing sons.

Source officielle

Page 17 sur 527

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0124DEC001973207

Admin. suprême

24 janvier 2012

24 janvier 2012

He was placed in remand prison IZ-61/3 of Novocherkassk, Rostov Region, but throughout his detention he was occasionally placed in another detention facility ( ИВС ) of Belaya Kalitva, Rostov Region.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-146927

Admin. suprême

10 septembre 2014

10 septembre 2014

On 16 March 2011 Mr U., acting on behalf of the Russian Ministry of Finance, retracted the appeal and the judgment of 17 January 2011 became final and enforceable.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1970:0721DEC000411969

Admin. suprême

21 juillet 1970

21 juillet 1970

the applicant, who had been convicted of homosexuality on several charges, has had a fair trial and whether or not the courts have given the applicant the opportunity to have all the witnesses on his behalf

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-118341

Admin. suprême

12 mars 2013

12 mars 2013

B. as witnesses on his behalf. On 24 July 2008 the Criminal Court of Appeal decided to dismiss the appeal, relying on the same evidence.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0115DEC000794007

Admin. suprême

15 janvier 2019

15 janvier 2019

Head of the enterprise ... acts on behalf of the enterprise and represents its interests.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0324DEC001489006

Admin. suprême

24 mars 2009

24 mars 2009

but also on behalf of M.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:1020DEC002935795

Admin. suprême

20 octobre 1997

20 octobre 1997

  These provisions extended to espionage on behalf of the Federal Republic of Germany.   II.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-145631

Admin. suprême

16 juin 2014

16 juin 2014

This authorisation, according to the Supreme Court, only entitled the holders of the procuration to perform, on behalf of the company, acts falling within the scope of substantive law.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-139132

Admin. suprême

15 novembre 2013

15 novembre 2013

These acts (demonstrations) are realised on behalf of the organisation within its knowledge and in line with its will.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-142742

Admin. suprême

4 avril 2014

4 avril 2014

In particular, he noted that he had not been represented by a lawyer and that the judge had refused to hear witnesses on his behalf.

Source officielle
CJUE

CJUE

ECLI:EU:C:1987:391

CJUE

29 septembre 1987

29 septembre 1987

. # Terugvordering van het onverschuldigd betaalde - Bewijs dat belastingen niet in de prijs van produkten zijn doorberekend. # Gevoegde zaken 331/85, 376/85 en 378/85.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-196972

Admin. suprême

25 septembre 2019

25 septembre 2019

QUESTION As regards the Saratov Regional Court’s refusal to obtain the attendance of witnesses R., G., and K. on the applicant’s behalf, have the guarantees of the fair trial set out in Article  

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-169985

Admin. suprême

8 décembre 2016

8 décembre 2016

35.45pt; margin-bottom:0pt } Resolution CM/ResDH(2016)348 Execution of the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights Association for the defence of human rights in Romania – Helsinki Committee on behalf

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-126966

Admin. suprême

9 septembre 2013

9 septembre 2013

Diyarbakır Public Prosecutor on suspicion of aiding and abetting an illegal organisation, the PKK (Kurdish Workers’ Party), under Article   314 of the Criminal Code and making terrorist propaganda on behalf

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-121016

Admin. suprême

14 mai 2013

14 mai 2013

She stated her intention to pursue the proceedings before the Court in her own name as well as on behalf of her late husband. 6.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0923DEC004372107

Admin. suprême

23 septembre 2010

23 septembre 2010

He lived in Belaya Kalitva, the Rostov Region. The Russian Government (“the Government”) are represented by Mr G. Matuyshkin, their Representative at the European Court of Human Rights.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0418DEC004738620

Admin. suprême

18 avril 2024

18 avril 2024

The applicant’s lawyer was also invited to submit by 1   February   2024 written observations in reply on behalf of the applicant, together with any claim for just satisfaction.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0314DEC004871308

Admin. suprême

14 mars 2017

14 mars 2017

On 22 June 2016 the applicant’s representative informed the Court that the applicant sold his land to a third person and that they wished to continue the application on behalf of the latter.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-2109

Admin. suprême

4 mars 2008

4 mars 2008

On the applicant’s behalf, her husband lodged an appeal against that refusal with the visa Appeals Board. The appeal was rejected for non-compliance by the applicant with the regulations in force.

Source officielle