His arguments were summarised as follows:     "It was clear that not all unused material had been disclosed ...

One week later, the applicant company’s chairman, Mr Eduard Muşuc, was arrested for peacefully demonstrating against his company’s closure. 32 .

    The applicants were represented by Mr Eduard Markov, a lawyer admitted to practice in Odessa.

Todorov et elle les avait amenés jusqu’à la porte de l’appartement de ce dernier, qui était fermée à clef.

Adresse 16] Représentés par Me Katell FERCHAUX-LALLEMENT de la SELARL BDL AVOCATS, Postulant, avocat au barreau de VERSAILLES, vestiaire : 629 et Me Julien FAUCHER substituant à l'audience Me Charles-Edouard

domiciliés en cette qualité audit siège [Adresse 13] [Localité 27] Représentée par Me Stéphane FERTIER de la SELARL JRF AVOCATS & ASSOCIES, avocat au barreau de PARIS, toque : L0075 assistée de Me Edouard

in deciding whether the proceedings have been fair within the meaning of Article 6 of the Convention, the proceedings in question should be considered in their entirety (see among other authorities Edwards

    The Court notes that it is clear from the materials submitted by the Government that at least, as of 2010, the first applicant Ms   Khamastkhanova was no longer married to the second

It is clear from the case-file that the application form bears the date of 18 April 2009, which is well within the six month time-limit.

  What they don’t make clear is that a diet high in fat, sugar, animal products and salt (sodium), and low in fibre, vitamins and minerals - which describes an average McDonald’s meal - is linked

Where it is clear from the outset, however, that no effective remedy is available to the applicant, the period runs from the date of the acts or measures complained of, or from the date of the applicant

no. 27229/95, ECHR 2001 III; McKerr v. the United Kingdom , no. 28883/95, ECHR 2001 ‑ III; Hugh Jordan v. the United Kingdom , no. 24746/94, ECHR 2001 ‑ III (extracts); Paul and Audrey Edwards

Where it is clear from the outset, however, that no effective remedy is available to the applicant, the period runs from the date of the acts or measures complained of, or from the date of knowledge of

However, where it is clear from the outset that no effective remedy is available to the applicant, the period runs from the date of the acts or measures complained of.

Where it is clear from the outset however that no effective remedy is available to the applicant, the period runs from the date of the acts or measures complained of, or from the date of knowledge of that

principle, be capable of leading to the establishment of the facts of the case and, if the allegations prove to be true, to the identification and punishment of those responsible (see Paul and Audrey Edwards

The decision made it clear that, prior to that moment, neither the authorities nor the management of the nursery school had had any grounds to take any particular health measures.

    Nevertheless, it was clear from his rulings that the trial judge had considered disclosure first and then abuse of process.

The Court holds that the latter amount to fundamental safeguards (see, to converse effect, Edwards and Lewis v. the United Kingdom , nos. 39647/98 and 40461/98, § 58, 22 July 2003, and Leas v.