with rights secured under the Convention, the Court seeks to establish whether the reasons provided for decisions given by the domestic courts are automatic or stereotypical (see, mutatis mutandis , Paradiso

    The Government submitted that the applicant’s relationship with the child did not fall under the notion of “family life” since, until 2018, that is, until the child had reached the age of

exercising its supervisory function, the Court’s task is not to take the place of the national courts, but rather to review, in the light of the case as a whole, whether the decisions they have taken fall

Ireland [GC], no. 25579/05 , § 212, 16 December 2010; and Paradiso and Campanelli v. Italy [GC], no. 25358/12 , § 163, 24 January 2017).

serious deficiencies in the daily care received by the child, or serious deficiencies in terms of the personal contact and security needed by a child of his or her age and development, (b) if the parents fail

Allah is neither in the sky nor in paradise, but in the centre of the human heart. B.     The applicants' request for exemption and application to have the decision set aside 10.

Mano valia butu visits per kamina Ausvice paleisciau... ) Comment no. 20, by PANKAS: “The more gays and other faggots appear, the more people who cannot stand them will fall [on them].

Moreover, the cells had been regularly cleaned of parasites and he had had access to a shower, while his bed linen had been changed once a week.

[the applicant] was watching ... videos entitled “In search of paradise” that contained advice on establishing the Islamic State, messages by [Y.], a former “Amir” of this organisation and also Abduvali

The applicant’s cells had been stuffy and infested with parasites. Toilet facilities had offered no privacy.

    Lastly, the Court notes that the Government did not refute the applicant’s allegations that on certain occasions the inmates suffering from contagious diseases or having parasites were placed

These complaints fall outside the scope of the present application and will not be further examined. THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 6.

The court changed the preventive measure – detention on remand – imposed on the applicant to a prohibition on changing his residence, which he had to acknowledge by his signature ( paraksts par dzīves

The applicant therefore concluded that significant information had been deliberately withheld by the relevant authorities and that the search had been ordered and carried out on false pretences, being

that the first-instance court had rejected his request to have his handcuffs removed during the trial, that some witnesses had not been questioned, and that the transcripts of the hearings had been false

  25579/05, §   212, 16   December 2010; and Paradiso and Campanelli v. Italy [GC], no.   25358/12, § 163, 24   January 2017).

celle retenue par les trois maîtres nageurs-- sauveteurs grâce à un repère précis (ils se trouvaient occupés aux préparatifs de l'ouverture de la surveillance de la plage qui s'effectue à 15 heures), paraît

serious deficiencies in the daily care received by the child, or serious deficiencies in terms of the personal contact and security needed by a child of his or her age and development; (b) if the parents fail

Either it has to employ the test which determines with certainty AIDS, or it fails to do the test and assumes responsibility for providing blood which was infected with AIDS.