CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-109653
9 janvier 2012
On 1 May 2010 at about 3 a.m., the applicant, having been merry drinking alcohol in a bar, was on his way home, when a patrol of municipal police stopped him and asked him to show his identity papers.
Page 17 sur 3277
ECLI:CEDH:001-223741
2 mars 2023
On the way to the station, as the applicant allegedly tried to abscond, the officers restrained him and hit him repeatedly in the head and the torso; thereafter, at the police station they subjected him
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1202DEC000215610
2 décembre 2014
to it and controlling its use, and preventing him from instructing his defence counsel effectively.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1105JUD000365012
5 novembre 2020
Allegedly, they had pushed him towards the wall and had hit him on different parts of his body approximately ten to fifteen times (at short intervals).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0323DEC003284696
23 mars 1999
Moreover, it forced him to separate from his family who were dependent on his income.
ECLI:CEDH:001-214573
1 décembre 2021
The applicant also states that the prison authorities failed to secure the blood samples necessary for his admission to hospital on 19 November 2018 for a scheduled hip replacement surgery.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0727JUD002614495
27 juillet 2004
They gave him Mehmet Şah's leather jacket but the witness refused to take it stating that his son would be cold without his jacket.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0830JUD006441810
30 août 2016
One of the police officers put his knee on his neck and pushed him to the ground. He was handcuffed and then the officers started punching and kicking him all over his body and head.
ECLI:CEDH:001-122559
19 juin 2013
According to the documents submitted by the applicant, his wife had brought divorce civil proceedings against him.
ECLI:CEDH:001-116016
18 décembre 2012
body ( mandat de aducere ) issued by a prosecutor attached to the N.A.D., took him from his workplace to the N.A.D.’s office.
ECLI:CEDH:001-111051
5 avril 2012
The examination report described the applicant’s condition upon his admission to the hospital as “a traumatic hip dislocation” and “multiple tear-contused wounds on the face” and the condition as “serious
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0928JUD007504511
28 septembre 2023
Allegedly, he had to stand, several times, for up to an hour, in a strained pose; any move resulted in blows to legs or arms; one officer hit him with a fist to the plexus; another one grabbed his neck
soc
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2019:SO00079
23 janvier 2019
société Qualitas Services Company puis le 20 décembre 2012 à la société Ecossaise Operating ; qu'il a été informé par l'employeur qu'il devrait reprendre ses fonctions à Ramatuelle pour la saison automne-hiver
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2017:SO02035
20 septembre 2017
, commandants de bord sur (Airbus) A330 et A320, se sont portés volontaires pour un stage de qualification sur divers appareils au cours de la saison été 2010 et de la saison hiver
civ2
61372418cd580146774122c6
5 juin 2003
articles L. 226-7 et R 226-12 du Code rural alors en vigueur et 2248 du Code civil ; Attendu, selon l'arrêt infirmatif attaqué, que, victime de dégâts causés à ses cultures par du gibier au cours de l'hiver
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0216JUD000433606
16 février 2021
The applicant was taken to the police station where, according to him, the officers handcuffed him and hit him on his head and body with rubber truncheons, and applied electric shocks, forcing
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-3815
23 juin 2005
The District Court ordered him to return the child to the mother, but the applicant went into hiding with his son.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0630JUD007087911
30 juin 2020
He therefore requested that the court grant him access to his son and establish his right to see him once a fortnight, on Saturday or Sunday from 11 a.m. until 7 p. m., and to spend his annual leave
ECLI:CEDH:002-3350
11 avril 2006
He has protested his innocence ever since. In a judgment of 7 May 1966 the Assize Court found him guilty as charged and sentenced him to life imprisonment.
ECLI:CEDH:001-187652
16 octobre 2018
In particular the applicant argued that the courts’ failures to lawfully summons him at his home address throughout the proceedings brought against him by the National Council for the Study of Securitate