(see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 11   March 2021 as a Committee composed of:   Branko Lubarda, President,   Carlo Ranzoni,   Pauliine

A, dont celui-ci considère qu'il s'agit de livres, d'une console de jeux vidéo, d'une lampe de chevet, de poivre et piment, d'un sèche-serviettes, d'un réveil, d'une rallonge et de multiprises.

and Mr Manchev) Violation of Article 6 § 1 (length) Just satisfaction: (Mr Yankov) EUR 3,000, (Mr Manchev) EUR 2,000 (non-pecuniary damage) and EUR   1,500, jointly (costs and expenses)   Paulić

lists mentioned in subsection 4, lay assessors, four substitutes from among enforcement officers and four substitutes from other lay assessors in the fixed order.

In doing so, the judge did not enable the applicant or his lawyer to examine the expert in their presence.

avocat constitué, substituée par Me Panagiotis Aiwansedo, avocat au barreau de Lille, avocat plaidant COMPOSITION DE LA COUR LORS DES DÉBATS ET DU DÉLIBÉRÉ Déborah Bohée, présidente de chambre Pauline

aid lawyer, T.Ž. 20.

refused to hire a lawyer (see paragraph 14 above).

  Yılmaz, lawyers practising in Diyarbakır. 3.

  Kimoska, lawyers practising in Skopje and Prilep; the decision to give notice of the application to the Government of North Macedonia (“the Government”), represented by their Agent, Ms D.

DECISION Application no. 63592/19 SALONA GRADITELJ D.D. against Croatia   The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 3   October 2023 as a Committee composed of:   Pauliine

  Belevičius, a lawyer practising in Vilnius; the decision to give notice of the application to the Lithuanian Government (“the Government”), represented by their Agent, Ms K.

Kojić, a lawyer practising in Belgrade. 3.     The Serbian Government (“the   Government”) were given notice of the applications on 18 June 2020. THE FACTS 4.

Epçeli Arslan, a lawyer practising in Istanbul; the decision to give notice of the complaints under Article 6 of the Convention to the Turkish Government (“the Government”), represented by their Agent,

/14 J.M.O. against the United Kingdom The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 21   February 2017 as a Committee composed of:   Kristina Pardalos, President,   Pauliine

If his client is successful and is thus entitled to legal costs under Section 91, the lawyer can request that the domestic court award such costs directly to him ( distrazione delle spese ).

The trial court held that the applicant had been acting as the lawyer of M.S., who had sent him a certain sum of money so that he could use it as a guarantee in order to obtain a provisional attachment

Boğatekin, a lawyer practising in Istanbul. The Turkish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent. THE FACTS THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 4.

[K] [N] C/ S.A. [5] INFIRMATION PARTIELLE Grosse délivrée le 13 1 23 à Me Bernard DE LAMY Me Pauline VAISSIERE POLE