The Administrative Court allowed the police’s claim and dismissed the applicant’s counterclaim.

Furthermore, they argued that the applicant had been adamant in rejecting the police’s suggested compromise to limit the area in question to a secluded part of Kossuth Square, although this solution would

The court agreed with the police’s decision in that although the right to assembly was a constitutional fundamental right, it was not absolute and must not give rise to a violation of the fundamental rights

Borovichi Police’s failure to verify the existence of a valid arrest warrant prior to placing the applicant’s name on the federal list of wanted persons was further aggravated by the Novgorod Police’s

    The Administrative Court found that, notwithstanding the police’s lawful orders, the applicant had failed to vacate the area near the President’s Office and had continued obstructing the

    On the Regional Police’s request, the President of the Saratov Regional Court applied for a supervisory review of this judgment.

The court agreed with the police’s decision in that although the right to assembly was a constitutional fundamental right, it was not absolute and must not give rise to a violation of the fundamental rights

The European Court found that the law applicable at the material time was neither precise enough nor clear enough for the public with regard to the length of such detention and the exercise of the police's

They criticised the Frederikshaven police’s handling of the investigation.

    Did the courts assess the reasons why the operation had been mounted, the extent of the police’s involvement in the offence and the nature of any incitement or pressure to which the applicant

    Did the courts assess the reasons why the operation had been mounted, the extent of the police’s involvement in the offence and the nature of any incitement or pressure to which the applicant

    Did the courts assess the reasons why the operation had been mounted, the extent of the police’s involvement in the offence and the nature of any incitement or pressure to which the applicant

    Did the courts assess the reasons why the operation had been mounted, the extent of the police’s involvement in the offence and the nature of any incitement or pressure to which the applicant

, testimony records, the Nasimi District Court’s request for examination of the video recordings of the security cameras of the Nasimi District Police Office’s temporary detention facility and the police’s

    Did the courts assess the reasons why the operation had been mounted, the extent of the police’s involvement in the offence and the nature of any incitement or pressure to which the applicant

when arresting the applicant during a demonstration; and, unanimously, that there had been a violation of Article   11 (freedom of assembly and association) of the Convention, on account of the police’s

    Did the courts assess the reasons why the operation had been mounted, the extent of the police’s involvement in the offence and the nature of any incitement or pressure to which the applicant

    Did the courts assess the reasons why the operation had been mounted, the extent of the police’s involvement in the offence and the nature of any incitement or pressure to which the applicant

On 23 July 2007 the prosecutor sent a letter to the head of the local police’s investigations department, noting that: “I draw your attention to the investigator’s procrastination and to violation of the