CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

3 766 résultats pour « Stéphanie LAMY Me »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1022DEC005433710

Admin. suprême

22 octobre 2013

22 octobre 2013

On 12 February 2010, the CBA declined to appoint a lawyer to the applicant, stating that she did not satisfy the necessary legal requirements.

Page 17 sur 189

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0514DEC005362619

Admin. suprême

14 mai 2020

14 mai 2020

Cseterics, a lawyer practising in Budapest.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0912DEC008045013

Admin. suprême

12 septembre 2019

12 septembre 2019

Kessels, a lawyer practising in Amsterdam.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0520DEC000322020

Admin. suprême

20 mai 2021

20 mai 2021

Rozumovskyy , a lawyer practising in Kharkiv.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1010DEC004130915

Admin. suprême

10 octobre 2019

10 octobre 2019

The applicant was represented by Ms Patócs, a lawyer practising in Tapolca.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0528DEC005137819

Admin. suprême

28 mai 2020

28 mai 2020

Cseterics, a lawyer practising in Budapest.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1031JUD000014707

Admin. suprême

31 octobre 2017

31 octobre 2017

litigants, witnesses, lawyers and lay members of the court during proceedings. 9 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0620DEC003778517

Admin. suprême

20 juin 2024

20 juin 2024

Vivchar, a lawyer practising in Novoselytsa; Having deliberated, decides as follows: SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE 1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0923DEC001285112

Admin. suprême

23 septembre 2014

23 septembre 2014

According to information available on internet, the applicant’s lawyer still works for this law firm which still has its offices at the same address.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1122505-1162643

Admin. suprême

7 septembre 2004

7 septembre 2004

  The applicants were refused legal aid and so represented themselves throughout the trial and appeal, with only some help from volunteer lawyers.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0911DEC000954111

Admin. suprême

11 septembre 2012

11 septembre 2012

  Cír, a   lawyer practising in Mochov. A.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0131DEC001210906

Admin. suprême

31 janvier 2011

31 janvier 2011

Stoyanov, a lawyer practising in Pazardzhik. The Bulgarian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mrs R. Nikolova, of the Ministry of Justice.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1011DEC000660507

Admin. suprême

11 octobre 2011

11 octobre 2011

Gričnik, a lawyer practising in Žalec. The Slovenian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1103DEC000286907

Admin. suprême

3 novembre 2011

3 novembre 2011

Munih, a lawyer practising in Koper. The Slovenian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0104DEC005418008

Admin. suprême

4 janvier 2012

4 janvier 2012

  Jarkovič, a lawyer practising in Ljubljana. The Slovenian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0104DEC002457406

Admin. suprême

4 janvier 2012

4 janvier 2012

Teržan, a lawyer practising in Celje. The Slovenian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0705DEC003185707

Admin. suprême

5 juillet 2011

5 juillet 2011

Levytskyy, a lawyer practising in Kyiv. The Ukrainian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms   V.   Lutkovska, from the Ministry of Justice.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0412DEC002136907

Admin. suprême

12 avril 2011

12 avril 2011

Zeycan, a lawyer practising in Bochum. The German Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mrs   A.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1113DEC000593712

Admin. suprême

13 novembre 2012

13 novembre 2012

Brettschneider, a lawyer practising in Sulingen. The German Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mrs K. Behr, of the Federal Ministry of Justice.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0904DEC003017506

Admin. suprême

4 septembre 2012

4 septembre 2012

  Končan Verstovšek, a lawyer practising in Celje. The Slovenian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent.

Source officielle