CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-152342
22 janvier 2015
They further asked the court to order the release of the premises free and unencumbered and, if this were not possible, to establish fair conditions and a fair rent over the property for the future.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0909DEC003176796
9 septembre 1998
At this instant they hit [C] several times in the head with bicycle front forks at the same time as the accused Bo Rasmussen kicked him on his body.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1984:1218JUD000715175
18 décembre 1984
They left this matter to the Court’s discretion. 3. The Commission’s Delegate 17.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1020JUD007498901
20 octobre 2005
They considered that the removal of the sign had not been carried out on any statutory basis and had thus been an arbitrary act.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1218JUD002877409
18 décembre 2012
The Board did not find this credible as it questioned that the police would have arrested someone whom they had not identified as a participant in the demonstration.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-9952
1 juillet 2014
As to the women concerned, they were thus obliged to give up completely an element of their identity that they considered important, together with their chosen manner of manifesting their religion or beliefs
ECLI:CEDH:002-13776
8 septembre 2022
The interference had thus been in accordance with the law. 3. Whether it pursued a legitimate aim – The interference at issue pursued the legitimate aim of health protection.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0515JUD003732613
15 mai 2018
The measure was thus contrary to Article 10 of the Convention. 4.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0218DEC006022309
18 février 2014
In this case it is clear that this element was missing, since the defendants knew or ought to have known that they acquired possession of the flat at issue in an illegal and unlawful manner.
civ3
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2019:C300137
21 février 2019
H..., domicilié [...] , contre l'arrêt rendu le 14 décembre 2017 par la cour d'appel de Grenoble (chambre commerciale), dans le litige l'opposant à la société The Must, société à responsabilité limitée
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1123JUD004740507
23 novembre 2017
    The applicants and the Government each filed observations. They informed the Court that they had failed to reach an agreement. THE LAW 6.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0906DEC003674197
6 septembre 2001
Thus this part of the application must be rejected as being manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 4 of the Convention.   4.
ECLI:CEDH:002-2453
16 octobre 2007
They complained that a new building permit had been issued which modified the building specifications fixed initially, thus frustrating their expectations of developing the site in conformity with the
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0107DEC000815818
7 janvier 2020
They argued that the case should be referred back to the Migration Agency because of this new information, the ongoing custody proceedings and alleged deficiencies in the Agency’s handling of the case.
ECLI:CEDH:002-10662
26 mai 2015
The judges in the Assize Court had thus contributed to drafting reasoning which partly concerned a deliberation at which they had not been present.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0221DEC003502197
21 février 2002
Thus, any hearings held after the said change in law in the proceedings at issue complied with the requirements of Article 6 § 1. The applicants did not make any submissions in reply on this point.
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-97987
4 mars 2010
They did not appeal this decision.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0603JUD004843118
3 juin 2021
to that of this article occurs, the provisions of this article shall apply only to offences committed after the commencement of this Act.” 30 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1026DEC000035102
26 octobre 2004
The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicants and as they appear from the documents, may be summarised as follows.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0730JUD000104612
30 juillet 2015
At first, this was not contested by the Government, but at a later stage in the proceedings, they submitted that the property had been abandoned and was not in use. 7.
Page 17 sur 4857