.s4F7716CF { width:223.01pt; display:inline-block } .sDEA786DA { width:210.67pt; display:inline-block } FIRST SECTION FINAL DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 40518/98 by Süleyman YILDIRIM

Bestami SONKAYA Mevlüt SONKAYA Habibe SONKAYA Güler UYANIK Hatice İZĞİ Sultan YILDIRIM Raziye ÖZEL       01.02.1994         25.09.1995       188.122.212

/2013   46540/13 Selahattin ASLAN 10/01/1980   21/12/2011 24/12/2011 19/06/2013   46541/13 Safet ORMAN 01/08/1991   20/12/2011 24/12/2011 11/02/2013   46542/13 Mehmet Emin YILDIRIM

  Mehmet Nevzat YILDIRIMER, né en 1966, instituteur et résidant à Siirt.

Italie (déc.), no 43490/98, 15   novembre 2001, et, mutatis mutandis , Yildirim c. Italie (déc.), n o   38602/02, CEDH 2003 ‑ IV).

  108, concerning a ban on importing gold coins, or Yildirim v.   Italy   (dec.), no.   38602/02 , ECHR 2003-IV, concerning a vehicle used for trafficking in human beings).

Türkiye 29/12/2022 Emrah YILDIRIM 1985 Şanlıurfa Turkish 54. 2675/23 Karateke v. Türkiye 05/01/2023 Erdal KARATEKE 1968 Denizli Turkish 55. 2676/23 Turan v.

Türkiye 23/06/2023 Erdal YILDIRIM 1984 Istanbul Turkish   26789/23 Tatar v. Türkiye 27/06/2023 Ali TATAR 1980 Kahramanmaraş Turkish   26819/23 Altıngüneş v.

Türkiye 26/03/2021 Sadık YILDIRIM 1988 Tokat Turkish 18. 18025/21 Ketenci v. Türkiye 29/03/2021 Sinan KETENCİ 1976 Eskişehir Turkish 19. 18029/21 Koca v.

Türkiye 12/06/2020 Raziye YILDIRIM 1990 Burdur Turkish 76. 28094/20 Dalkes v. Türkiye 23/06/2020 Bayram Ali DALKES 1984 Muş Turkish 77. 29057/20 Emek v.

Türkiye 29/03/2018 Abdurrahman YILDIRIM 1983 Giresun Turkish Hilal YILMAZ PUSAT Awarded 43. 16907/18 Alemdar v.

AKTAŞ 15/09/1969 Samsun   Refiye KARABABA 19/11/1970 Samsun         Fevzi Cem ŞENOCAK             7857/12 22/06/2011 Ali Rıza YILDIRIM

THE FACTS The applicant, Mr Huseyin Yildirim, is a Turkish national who was born in 1950. He was represented before the Court by Mr H. Kaplan, a lawyer practising in Istanbul.

interest in the present case, the Court points out that the applicant’s putative son is currently more than forty years old and is not dependent on the applicant for maintenance (compare and contrast Yildirim

sAAF48370 { width:22.55pt; display:inline-block } .sF52EF7EE { width:229.11pt; display:inline-block }       DEUXIÈME SECTION             AFFAIRE YUMUŞAK ET YILDIRIM

security forces as “mass ‑ murderers” legitimised and glorified the violent acts and methods of the PKK/KCK, an armed terrorist organisation 2,000 250     12156/21 09/02/2021 Bahri YILDIRIM

.sAAF48370 { width:22.55pt; display:inline-block } .s28D5A7B8 { width:232.45pt; display:inline-block } TROISIÈME SECTION DÉCISION SUR LA RECEVABILITÉ de la requête n o 40074/98 présentée par Feyzi YILDIRIM

Türkiye 24/07/2018 Ali YILDIRIM 1987 Antalya Turkish Awarded 61. 37823/18 Çoşkun v. Türkiye 02/07/2018 Ramazan ÇOŞKUN 1975 Hatay Turkish Awarded 62. 39054/18 Çaylı v.

s6B64E62F { width:203.14pt; display:inline-block } .s4E9ED0B3 { width:208.66pt; display:inline-block } FIRST SECTION PARTIAL DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 40518/98 by Süleyman YILDIRIM

Cypriot Ata DAYANCH     3731/10 12/12/2009 Mehmet Hulusi AHMET Lefkosa Cypriot   Hatice HASAN MANDILA Lefkosa Cypriot   Hayriye EMIR OSMAN Lefkosa Cypriot   Nezihe Nevruz MEHMED YILDIRIM