The Court has previously accepted that close relatives of applicants who have died can maintain applications that include complaints concerning various aspects of Article   6 of the Convention (see

GRIEFS Invoquant l’article 2 de la Convention, les requérants se plaignent de n’avoir pas pu participer à la procédure dans la mesure nécessaire à la défense de leurs intérêts.

It follows that he can not now claim to be the “victim” of a violation of the Convention as required by Article 34 of the Convention.

under Article 3 of the Convention about poor conditions of their ongoing detention are inadmissible.

COMPLAINT The applicants complain under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that their case, which commenced in 1989 and terminated in 1996, was not heard within a reasonable time as required by the Convention

ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 § 1 of the Convention 7.

They relied, in particular, on Article   6 of the Convention and Article   1 of Protocol   No.   1 to the Convention. 18.

In application no. 45176/17, they further acknowledged a violation of Article 13 of the Convention (see appended table below).

    On 12 May 2010 the Court gave notice to the Government of the applicant’s complaint under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the alleged lack of adequate medical treatment for her various

    The applicants complained under Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (d) of the Convention that the domestic courts had not provided good reasons for reading-out of the pre-trial statements of the witnesses

Citant l’article 8 de la Convention combiné avec l’article 13 de celle-ci, les requérants se plaignent d’une absence d’un recours effectif au travers duquel ils auraient pu faire établir s’ils avaient

    SUR LA VIOLATION ALLÉGUÉE DE L’ARTICLE 6 § 1 DE LA CONVENTION 20.

  The Court of Appeal noted that the Federal Court, in its judgment of 29 March 1990, had found no breach of Article 6 para. 1 of the Convention in respect of the length of the proceedings.

They refer to Articles 6, 8 and 13 of the Convention. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.

    Complaints under Article   6 § 1 of the Convention Relying on Article 6 of the Convention the applicants complained that restitution of their nationalised properties and/or compensation

Referring to Article 6 of the Convention, the applicants essentially complain that the rejection of their claims for costs and expenses, as well as the “flagrantly divergent case-law of the domestic courts

    COMPLAINTS           The applicant complains under Article 6 para. 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention about the

Their complaints under Article   6 of the Convention and Article   1 of Protocol   No.

APPLICATION OF ARTICLE   41 OF THE CONVENTION 13.