The applicants submit that the alleged breaches of their rights occurred in the period between 2017 and 2020.

    The case concerns the applicant’s alleged ill-treatment and the alleged lack of an effective investigation. It raises issues under Article 3 of the Convention. 2 .

  The second alleged incident of ill-treatment It was not disputed that the applicant sustained part of his injuries when jumping or falling from the third floor.

Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, §   131, ECHR 2000-IV), was there an effective investigation into the alleged ill-treatment?   3.

THE COURT’S ASSESSMENT Alleged violation of Article 6 § 2 of the Convention 14.

of the applicant’s main arguments and the Constitutional Court’s alleged failure to examine his complaints.

    The case concerns the respondent State’s alleged failure to protect the applicant from domestic violence allegedly perpetrated by her former husband.

Eventually, she helped the applicant to bring legal proceedings as regards the sale of the flat and the alleged intrusions therein. B.

The court also stated that Russian legislation provided for no right to claim non-pecuniary damage in connection with the alleged violation of property rights.

THE COURT’S ASSESSMENT Alleged violation of Article 1 of Protocol No.   1 to the Convention 15.

had been subjected to in police custody, as well as of the alleged sexual assault by M.S.

He further alleged that following his arrest he was blindfolded and ill-treated.

They alleged a breach of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention. The first, second, third and fifth applicants also alleged a breach of Article 1 of Protocol No.

Invoking Article 3 of the Convention, the applicant also alleged that he had been subjected to ill ‑ treatment during his questioning. 4.

The applicants alleged, inter alia , that during this period they had been victims of forced labour and human trafficking, had worked without contracts and work permits, had their documents taken away

The decision noted that the police officers, who were accused by the applicant, were not present in the police station on the day of the alleged incident.

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION 9.

It was alleged that the plot had been designed to put an end to Mr Kholodov’s publications about corruption in the Russian Army.

The complaint also alleged the crimes of abuse of office and general endangerment punishable under the domestic criminal law.

and the Central Election Commission (“the CEC”) concerning various alleged irregularities in the election process in his constituency.