The 16 survivors of the sinking complained to the Court, inter alia , that their lives had been endangered during the sinking by reason of the acts or omissions of the coastguard, that some of them had

There was also the risk, if a further appeal was unsuccessful that the applicants be subject to an award of costs or their lawyers held liable for costs if they had pursued the case unreasonably, improperly

They then proceeded along Svoboda Street towards the cemetery.

On the latter date they were transferred to the pre-trial detention section in Bistriţa Prison, where they remained until their release pending trial, in 2007 (see paragraph 4 above). 15.

Several men entered the house very quietly, so the owner of the house, D., did not hear them enter. They woke D. up and taped her mouth with adhesive tape. Then they demanded her passport.

The court found that the applicants had legally occupied apartment no. 93 since 1986, had acquired the right to possess it and that there were no grounds to conclude that they had lost their right to housing

Mr   Girgvliani then demanded that they show their police badges, and was again elbowed in the ribs.

The applicant company then challenged this refusal and sued V., requesting access to the funds.

They applied to the ordinary administrative court, which declined jurisdiction, then their case was referred to the Supreme Military Administrative Court which the Jurisdiction Disputes Court adjudged

The servicemen did not ask the applicants any questions, but told them that they were beating them in revenge for their killed comrades. Then both applicants were thrown into a helicopter.

    To the extent that the applicants sought to justify their claim of discrimination by reference to what they considered to be institutional racism by the police in Slovakia, when exercising

  In particular they claimed that they had been deprived of their right to a decision by the lawful judge (gesetzlicher Richter - Article 83 (2) of the Federal Constitution) and that there had been

They gathered them in a square outside the village. The security forces accused the villagers of assisting the PKK. They then dispersed among the houses and set them on fire.

First they went to Troitskaya village, then to Karabulak and then to Barsuki. There, he and some other officers entered the yard of the Velkhiyevs’ house.

The applicants complained of the conditions in which they were detained in the transit zone, alleging that there were no bedrooms or beds and that they were housed in the mosque located there; that they

They remained in the cafeteria, until about 17.00 hours, when they were taken to the main station and eref akmak took their statements. He then released them and told them to leave the station.

, the decision of the latter not to repatriate them, and therefore not to exercise its diplomatic or consular jurisdiction in respect of them, they were capable of falling within its jurisdiction for the

As, however, the Board of Admission rejected their applications, they took their cases to the Board of Appeal.

The man whom he had described said ‘Shoot them’ and he and three men drew their guns. Then they took Mehmet Şerif Avşar into the Toros car.

They did not follow the armed men into the street because there was no electricity and because they were afraid. 16.