and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on 22 May 2023 by two Slovak nationals, Ms Daniela Spišáková and Ms Carla Schweizer (“the applicants”), who were born in 2008 and 2010 respectively and live

} .s38729B7C { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; font-weight:bold } .s3DF053F { border-right:0.75pt solid #808080; border-left:0.75pt solid #808080; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #808080; padding-right:5.03pt

  38946/21* 02/07/2021 Ivan Petrovich RYGAYEV 1975   Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow Rally in support of A.

    PROCEDURE   The application was introduced before the European Commission of Human Rights on 2 February 1999 and registered on 2 February 1999.

LAKATOŠ against Serbia The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 28   November 2017 as a Committee composed of:   Pere Pastor Vilanova, President,   Branko Lubarda,

{ width:173.6pt; display:inline-block } .s64406319 { width:11.68pt; display:inline-block } .s7B0354FA { width:193.28pt; display:inline-block }   FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 29528/07 Daniela

width:174.62pt; display:inline-block } .s64406319 { width:11.68pt; display:inline-block } .s7B0354FA { width:193.28pt; display:inline-block }   THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 56525/11 Daniela

It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications

I reported the incident to a pedagogue, V.V., who immediately talked to Danijel, D.A. and the pupils who witnessed the incident, then called Danijel’s and A.’s parents and the police.

BONA-MURA against Romania and 6 other applications (see list appended) The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 1   December   2016 as a Committee composed of:  

IAMANDI against Romania and 3 other applications (see appended table)   The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 21   January 2021 as a Committee composed of:   Armen

It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications

NICOLESCU and Estera NICOLESCU against Romania The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 14   January   2014 as a Chamber composed of:   Josep Casadevall, President

BARBU against Romania The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on   31   March 2015 as a Committee composed of:   Luis López Guerra, President,   Johannes Silvis

  Complaints   The applicant complains under Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial) of the European Convention on Human Rights that he was not tried by an independent and impartial tribunal, as

margin-bottom:0pt } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sC36A6361 { font-family:Arial; color:#000000 } Published on 24 April 2023   FIRST SECTION Application no. 39980/22 Beáta JANOČKOVÁ and Daniel

font-size:11pt } .s24AC208E { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right

The San Marinese Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr Lucio Leopoldo Daniele.

inline-block } .s7602FED2 { width:18.21pt; display:inline-block } .sC1AC44A4 { width:228.11pt; display:inline-block } FOURTH SECTION FINAL DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 25391/02 by Daniel

{ font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 9443/23 Florian-Daniel