However, such proof may follow from the coexistence of sufficiently strong, clear and concordant inferences or of similar unrebutted presumptions of fact.

Each member of this court is of the clear opinion, despite the blemishes in an otherwise impeccable summing-up, no miscarriage of justice has actually occurred. ...” 4.

Where it is clear from the outset however that no effective remedy is available to the applicant, the period runs from the date of the acts or measures complained of, or from the date of knowledge of that

    According to the applicant, the investigation was in fact initiated after his arrest, as was clear not only from the time when the decision was countersigned by the prosecutor (4.40 p.m.,

   The third applicant, Mr Edward James Gunnell, is a British citizen, born in 1930. 34.

Furthermore, the judgments of the majority made clear that they were basing their decision solely on the particular content of the pleadings in the case.

  At the trial, however, it became clear for the applicant that he was accused of having raped the girl inside the school.

The Court’s task is to ascertain whether the proceedings in their entirety, including the way in which evidence was taken, were fair ( Edwards v.

The seven applicants are: Gerard Donnelly, age 29 years (No. 5577/72), Gerard Bradley, age 20 years (No. 5578/72), Edward Duffy, age 17 years (No 5579/72), all resident in Belfast; John Carlin, age 24

The Supreme Court also noted that the identity of the object to the decision to confiscate had to be unequivocally clear from the operative part of the court ruling. 29.

From the documents invoked below, it is clear that there had been some irregularities in the functioning of the pump and it broke down either in October or November 2007. 37.

inline-block } .s64406319 { width:11.68pt; display:inline-block } .s8DC73591 { width:184.78pt; display:inline-block }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 39203/02 by Eduard

Belgium , judgment of 22 April 1992, Series   A no. 235-B, p. 32, § 32, and Edwards v. the United Kingdom , judgment of 16 December 1992, Series A no. 247-B, pp. 34-35, § 34).

Belgium , 22   April 1992, Series   A no. 235-B, pp. 32-33, § 32 and Edwards v. the United Kingdom, 16 December 1992, Series A no. 247-B, §   34).

Moreover, it was clear that it did not normally fall within the applicant’s role as member of the Bank’s Board of Directors to take part in the Bank’s processing of an individual loan application.

Edward Fitzgerald, Barrister-at-law, of counsel.   In 1973 the applicant was sentenced to life imprisonment for the murder of a betting shop manageress in the course of a robbery.

Edward Fitzgerald, Barrister-at-law, of counsel.   In 1969 the applicant was sentenced to life imprisonment for the murder of a jeweller in the course of an armed robbery.

Court HR, the Edwards v. the United Kingdom judgment of 16 December 1992, Series A no. 247-B, pp. 34-35, para. 4 and the Saïdi v.

[Adresse 4] [Localité 2] Représenté(e) par Me Bertrand ROL de l'AARPI INTER-BARREAUX JRF AVOCATS, avocat Postulant au barreau de VERSAILLES, vestiaire : 617 - N° du dossier 20161342 et par Me Edouard