trial.

The applicant had participated in the trial, given evidence in his defence, and examined the evidence for the prosecution in open court.

The judgment was later quashed on appeal and the applicant acquitted of all the charges against him except for the theft of a lorry and trailer and handling.

In these circumstances, the applicant had a legitimate reason to fear that the juror might have had preconceived ideas capable of having a bearing on his innocence or guilt.

Furthermore, the applicant had not alleged that the trial courts and the Court of Cassation had acted on instructions from the President or demonstrated other bias.

, “the presumption of innocence imposes requirements in respect of, inter alia , ... premature expressions by the trial court or by other public officials of a defendant’s guilt”.

en conséquence, condamné à une peine de trois mois d'emprisonnement avec sursis ainsi qu'à une amende de 1 500 euros ; "aux motifs que, devant la Cour, Christian X... a reconnu que la cisaille guillotine

He pleaded not guilty and he was remanded on bail from time to time until he was returned for trial to the Dublin Circuit Criminal Court.

On 29 March 2010 this reply was received by the trial court.

    Was the applicant’s pre-trial detention in breach of Article 5 §§ 1 and   3 of the Convention, regard being had, in particular, to the extension of her arrest between 26 August and 2

Having been convicted of the charges at first instance, the applicant appealed arguing that his trial should have been suspended or adjourned until the end of the criminal proceedings he had initiated

    On 10 June 2011 the Frunzenskiy District Court of Saint Petersburg authorised the applicant’s pre-trial detention relying inter alia on his statements made to the police.

    Pre-trial investigation On 7 July 2005 the authorities in Tauragė opened a pre-trial investigation concerning M.K.’s injuries.

The principle of the presumption of innocence is laid down in Article 5 §   1 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in similar terms: “An accused shall not be presumed guilty until his guilt has been

These points could have been determined by the criminal court only at the trial stage of the proceedings.

These points could have been determined by the criminal court only at the trial stage of the proceedings.

    The applicant’s arrest and pre-trial investigation 5.

As they never reached Mr Sanader, the trial court ordered a Swiss company D.

It followed that the length of the pre-trial investigation was reasonable and did not violate the applicant’s right to a trial within a reasonable time.

In the trial court’s judgment the evidence of I., K., G. and O. was mentioned separately, and in that order, as disproving the applicant’s denials of his guilt. 33 .