CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
Ch.sociale-protec.sociale
69737c69cdc6046d476c2bb3
22 janvier 2026
AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANÇAIS COUR D'APPEL DE GRENOBLE CHAMBRE SOCIALE - PROTECTION SOCIALE ARRÊT DU 22 JANVIER 2026 Appel d'une décision (n° RG 23/00499) rendue
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0519DEC002363494
19 mai 1994
his family or other ties with that country and, if criminal behaviour would form the basis for his deportation, the character of his offence or offences (section 41, subsection 1).
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1126JUD000299106
26 novembre 2019
head, his right temple and his wrists had been sustained on 25 December 2002 in the course of his arrest in response to his resistance.
Pôle 5 - Chambre 3
627ca83c4781dc057dee7b32
11 mai 2022
à l'exécution du plan de la SARL SOCIETE DES AFFAIRES KESRAOUI, nommé à cette fonction par jugement du TC de Bobigny en date du 26 juin 2018 [Adresse 4] [Localité 7] représenté par Me Béatrice HIEST
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-162396
31 mars 2016
and asylum procedure had no automatic suspensive effect vis-à-vis his expulsion as it was ordered while the proceedings were still pending.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0713DEC002899795
13 juillet 1999
The applicant had failed to indicate in his request any new circumstances which could justify his release.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1966:0523DEC000251665
23 mai 1966
From his lengthy statements and the numerous documents submitted by him, the facts of his case appear as follows:   The Applicant was born in 1915 near Magdeburg and grew up in Germany until his parents
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0302DEC002049292
2 mars 1994
He was, thus, placed under a procedural disadvantage vis-a-vis his opponent.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0619DEC002055610
19 juin 2018
In a letter dated 10 July   2015 his heirs – his wife, Meral Yeşilova, his sons, Emre and Onur Yeşilova ‑ expressed their wish to continue the application in his stead. 2.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0824DEC004218698
24 août 1999
of his penalty on appeal.
ECLI:CEDH:001-249475
5 mars 2026
He further complains under Article 13 of the Convention that he did not have an effective domestic remedy at his disposal for his complaint under Article   8 of the Convention.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1124JUD007704312
24 novembre 2020
    The applicant complained that he had been deprived of his right to the determination of his dispute because the national courts had omitted to render a decision in respect of one of the opposing
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0219JUD005798011
19 février 2015
As the applicant had refused to confess, they had handcuffed his hands behind his back, pulled a black cap over his head, covering his eyes, and had taken him somewhere downstairs.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0705DEC002003707
5 juillet 2011
to deliberately misguide the Court and to force the success of his application.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0906DEC002395394
6 septembre 1995
life, his home and his correspondence."
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-14612
26 mai 2026
He expressed his wish to seek asylum in Greece.
Pôle 6 - Chambre 10
5fdc228541e5454698214afd
19 décembre 2018
matin on demande des précisions, hier après-midi on me précise qu'il s'agit seulement d'un tableau et hier soir il faut une note pour le soir même' Je fais le maximum pour répondre aux demandes claires
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0626DEC007143601
26 juin 2007
He further declared that he did not further pursue his complaint against his arrest and subsequent detention.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0328DEC004573899
28 mars 2000
His treatment as a Category A prisoner made him feel an outcast and damaged his health.
ECLI:CEDH:001-115816
14 décembre 2012
    The applicant’s version of events as to his capture, detention and rendition to Lithuania 3.
Page 18 sur 334