On 30 September 2005 the Kemerovo Regional Court extended the applicants’ pre-trial detention until 2 January 2006.

Finally, he submitted that his right to be presumed innocent had been infringed as a result of the publication of the preliminary investigation by the press and that the domestic courts had failed to hear

    The applicant complained of the excessive length of his pre-trial detention. He also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.

The applicants were held in pre-trial detention for periods ranging from one year to four years and five days. 4 .

Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the domestic courts failed to provide relevant and sufficient reasons for the applicants’ pre-trial detention.

Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the domestic courts failed to provide relevant and sufficient reasons for the applicants’ pre-trial detention.

    On 18 June 2008 the Permskiy District Court of the Perm Region extended his pre-trial detention on the same grounds. 7.

    The applicants complained of the excessive length of their pre-trial detention. THE LAW I.     JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS 5.

It is true that the first applicant’s pre-trial detention ended on 14 December 2007. He was therefore not required to pursue the avenue of a constitutional appeal.

    Period of pre-trial detention 16.

    The applicant complained that his pre-trial detention had been unreasonably long.

In Zohlandt , the applicant’s pre-trial detention had initially been based on the risk of reoffending.

    The applicants complained of the excessive length of their pre-trial detention. THE LAW JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS 5.

    On the same day, the Supreme Court ordered the pre-trial detention of the applicant – who was at the time serving the prison sentence previously imposed on him (see paragraph 28 below) –

    The relevant provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure concerning placement in pre-trial detention and the extension of pre-trial detention during a criminal trial, in force at the relevant

    The applicant complained that his pre-trial detention had been unreasonably long.

    The applicants complained of the excessive length of their pre ‑ trial detention.

Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Length of pre-trial detention)

The applicants were held in pre-trial detention for periods ranging from one year to four years and six months. 3 .

    In 2009 his pre-trial detention was further extended on 17 February and 27 May. 9.