CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

368 résultats pour « Samy SALAMON »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

PRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-3018076-3346005

Admin. suprême

12 février 2010

12 février 2010

He furthermore invokes Article 14 (prohibition of discrimination) in conjunction with Article 6 § 1, as in the case of a former colleague in the same situation the courts had eventually decided to examine

Page 18 sur 19

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-3262169-3640194

Admin. suprême

14 septembre 2010

14 septembre 2010

Under the same provision, they alleged that the criminal proceedings brought against the State agents concerned for failing to protect the journalist’s life had been ineffective.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-3148737-3511248

Admin. suprême

4 juin 2010

4 juin 2010

Relying on Article   6 § 1 (right of access to a court), he complains about the rejection of his appeal on the grounds that his interests were not the same as those of the other complainants.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0127DEC005444500

Admin. suprême

27 janvier 2004

27 janvier 2004

  115; Salmon Meneses v. Italy , no. 18666/91, Commission decision of 30 November 1994, unreported; and Flanders v. the Netherlands , no.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-146459

Admin. suprême

28 août 2014

28 août 2014

In the same period (Appendix 2, column no.

Source officielle
CC

soc

ECLI:FR:CCASS:2017:SO02021

Cassation

14 septembre 2017

14 septembre 2017

Samir Y..., domicilié [...], 2°/ M. Francisco A..., domicilié [...], 3°/ M.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0922JUD001616090

Admin. suprême

22 septembre 2009

22 septembre 2009

Turkey (no. 16162/90, §§ 11-22, 20 January 2009), and should be dismissed for the same reasons. II.     ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 1 OF PROTOCOL NO. 1 TO THE CONVENTION 13.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0710JUD000031015

Admin. suprême

10 juillet 2020

10 juillet 2020

    On the same day, all the members of the Walloon Parliament voted on a motion to approve all the elected representatives’ credentials.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-241601

Admin. suprême

19 décembre 2024

19 décembre 2024

The pedestal was repainted the same day at a cost of less than 20 euros. The applicant was convicted of vandalism under Article 214 of the Criminal Code.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0409JUD003239411

Admin. suprême

9 avril 2019

9 avril 2019

    The decision of 22 November 2011 was communicated to the third applicant on the same day. The applicants never appealed against it. 40 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0619JUD002730607

Admin. suprême

19 juin 2012

19 juin 2012

It was also decided to rule on the admissibility and merits of the application at the same time (Article 29 §   1). THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 5.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-3187520-3560858

Admin. suprême

8 juillet 2010

8 juillet 2010

even though a final decision had been taken by the courts in civil proceedings against him concerning the misappropriation of a photocopying machine, paper and ink cartridges, a civil claim about the same

Source officielle
CC

soc

ECLI:FR:CCASS:2018:SO00828

Cassation

30 mai 2018

30 mai 2018

Samir X..., domicilié [...] , 2°/ au syndicat CGT des entreprises de propreté des Bouches-du-Rhône, dont le siège est [...] , 3°/ au syndicat CFDT commerce et services des Bouches-du-Rhône, dont le

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0616JUD004415315

Admin. suprême

16 juin 2022

16 juin 2022

At that point, the applicant had been standing in the intimacy zone, that is to say, in the blind spot of the camera. 84 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0212JUD002724803

Admin. suprême

12 février 2009

12 février 2009

She reasoned that Leoma Meshayev, and also Bislan Saydayev, who had been detained on the same night by the same group of persons, could only have been detained by servicemen because of the use of military

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0108JUD004317004

Admin. suprême

8 janvier 2009

8 janvier 2009

Under the provisions of Article 29 § 3 of the Convention, it decided to examine the merits of the application at the same time as its admissibility. THE FACTS I.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1025JUD006872516

Admin. suprême

25 octobre 2022

25 octobre 2022

On the same day, the first applicant took a flight to Moldova and an arrest warrant was issued in respect of him. 11.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0612JUD005007418

Admin. suprême

12 juin 2025

12 juin 2025

The pedestal was repainted the same day at a cost of less than 20 euros. The applicant was convicted of vandalism under Article   214 of the Criminal Code.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1987:0302JUD000978782

Admin. suprême

2 mars 1987

2 mars 1987

Later that same day, he telephoned Gosport police station to say that he would give himself up. He was apprehended in the High Street by two police officers.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0127DEC004448498

Admin. suprême

27 janvier 2004

27 janvier 2004

  115; Salmon Meneses v. Italy , no.   18666/91, Commission decision of 30 November 1994, unreported; and Flanders v. the Netherlands , no.

Source officielle