They relied on Articles 6 and 13 of the Convention.

Thus, the upper limit set on the additional benefits had not negatively affected the applicant’s family life in practice.

distinction between the two groups: the latter group had sought to vindicate their rights through the courts and thus the extra benefits they had received were provided pursuant to Article 146(6) of the

However, the main question put to the courts in the present case was of a different nature: they were required to determine whether the impugned publications breached the applicant’s reputation to an extent

and thus retain victim status for the purposes of this complaint. 48.

The defendants declared that they did not object to this valuation.

Thus, the Board found that there was no general impediment to sending persons back to that country. It noted that the UNHCR shared this view.

Thus, the Government’s objection in this respect should, normally, be rejected.

They added that if the fact of referring to Abdullah Öcalan in this way was an offence, then they accepted being judged and convicted for doing so.

In view of this, the Court considers that the applicants’ had, at least on arguable grounds, a claim under domestic law, thus making Article 6 applicable. 40.

While the terms used were ambiguous and lacked the clarity to be expected in a legal provision of this nature, they suggested at most that registration could be refused where the request for registration

In that sense, the present application was thus to be distinguished from the case of Chapman v.

The examination of the applicants’ complaint was limited under this Article to the events leading to the death of their son.

The dominus and the empyhteutae refused this offer. 9.

While they did not specifically rely on the UNCSI, they ruled in the light of the definition in Article   2 of that convention to determine whether the act could be classified as an act of administration

This is sufficient to conclude that the applicant companies are the owners of the land in question and thus had a possession for the purposes of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (see, mutatis mutandis , Frendo

    As to the authorities, in the present case it does not appear that they proved reluctant to assist the applicants, nor that they actively opposed the applicants’ attempt to receive the flat

The applicant company could not thus rely on editorial confidentiality.

The applicant thus acted with dolus eventualis .

Thus, the Court had to establish whether the State had taken all the necessary measures to protect the applicants’ rights under this provision.