Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial

    On 22 January 2005 the applicant lodged with the Warsaw Court of Appeal a complaint under the provisions of the 17 June 2004 Act on complaints about a breach of the right to a fair trial

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial

    On an unspecified date in 1991 the applicants were released pending trial. 12.

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial

    On 22   November   1995 the applicant was committed for trial. 8.

    On 20 July 1999 the Donetsk Regional Court ( Донецький обласний суд ) [1] quashed the judgment and remitted the case for additional pre-trial investigation. 11.

of access to a court set forth in Article 6   §   1 of the Convention depends on the special features of the proceedings in issue, and it is necessary to take into account the whole of the trial

    On 9 August 2004 the applicant asked for the trial judge to be required to stand down because of excessive delays in the proceedings and because the judge had been excluded for bias from

The quashing of the first instance court’s decisions did not signify that the applicant had not been given a fair trial given that it was for the domestic courts to assess the probative value of evidence

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial

Consequently, at a hearing held on 4   March   2004 the trial court stayed the proceedings ex lege . 10.     The proceedings were resumed on 9 May 2007. 11.

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial