If so, was the use of presumptions confined to reasonable limits which took into account the importance of what was at stake for the applicants, also in light of the consequences on the applicable

The parties are invited to inform the Court what the effects of registering the ownership in the Real Estate Registry were and on what basis an ownership on real estate could be registered in both 1993

If so, on what legal basis did the applicant waive that right? In particular, did the trial court remind her of her right to a lawyer? If so, what was the applicant’s reply?

To what extent were the delays in the procedure imputable to the authorities?

    What was the scope of the right of ownership enjoyed by the applicant in respect of the property in question?

In particular,   (a)     What was the preliminary information based on which the police instituted criminal investigation against the applicant?

From the documents submitted it is unclear whether the applicant has been expelled from Russia and if so, when and under what circumstances. B.

  What was the law applicable to the relevant form of deprivation of property?

Furthermore, in other cases the domestic courts had followed an excessively restrictive approach to the criterion of what was at stake for the claimant.

    What were the precinct-specific grounds for each ConEC decision to order (or to refuse to order) vote recounts?

Similarly, the Court had held in Murray that to the extent necessary for the prisoner to know what he or she must do to be considered for release and under what conditions, it might be required that reasons

; provisionally what they are so that I can deal with them.

is allowed and what is not.

authority, to what extent and for what purposes this power has been exercised and to what use information so obtained has been put; and to recommend whether, how and subject to what safeguards, this power

If Kurdish parties take part in such an environment, what would be the PKK’s attitude?

The judge was, of course, in making that ruling, acutely conscious of the need to direct the jury in the clearest possible terms as to what evidence was admissible and what was not in the case of each

What was the size of the exercise yard and did it have a roof? b)     What was the size of the “conversation places” ( sohbet odası )?

Firstly, because it was part of his duties as administrator of the forum to be aware of what was written on it, in so far as he was, so to speak, its ‘censor’ on account of the fact that he created it;