CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1106JUD005523421
6 novembre 2025
health care services, financed from the State budget, in medical institutions outside a prison on the basis of medical indications ... 3.
Page 19 sur 80
Cour d'Appel
6253cd22bd3db21cbdd925c8
30 juin 2015
Celui-ci a mis fin le 9 janvier 2015 au contrat de travail le liant à la société Timac Agro (cf. une lettre du 18 décembre 2014 par laquelle il a été pris acte de sa démission) et a été gratifié par son
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:1203DEC001508889
3 décembre 1991
Only through the timely intervention of the then Head of Finance and Accounting, the present Managing Director <K.>, more serious damage could be prevented with the result that <D.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1222JUD004646806
22 décembre 2008
On 29 October 2007 the investigator decided that, due to the critical state of the applicant’s health, he should be released on bail.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0616DEC004225518
16 juin 2020
Nor had any grounds been found for granting him a residence permit on a discretionary basis on humanitarian grounds.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1214JUD005317617
14 décembre 2021
As a result, examining V.S. in a timely manner had become impossible, which had eventually resulted in her death. 13 .
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1204DEC002332716
4 décembre 2018
On the basis of the above ‑ mentioned report, criminal proceedings No.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1011DEC001264711
11 octobre 2016
the car in a timely manner to avoid a collision, and the General Directorate of Highways was two-eighths responsible for not placing warning signs and signals on the road. 15.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0430JUD000689912
30 avril 2015
The panel accepted a proposed bail and replaced an order for detention on remand with an order for house arrest ( Ксж.бр. 537/2010) .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1203DEC005724213
3 décembre 2019
employment contract for another job in the company corresponding to his qualifications, and (c) if the applicant refused to conclude such a new employment contract, he would be entitled to a certain basic
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1020JUD005355009
20 octobre 2011
On 5 December 2007 Mr V.Z. informed the Social Court that he was unable to give the expert opinion in a timely manner. 19.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-177339
8 septembre 2017
the federal or regional treasury (Article 1069 of the Civil Code). c) As regards the burden of proof It is for a party to prove the circumstances on which he or she relies as the basis
ECLI:CEDH:001-111791
29 mai 2012
They allege that the amputation of their son’s hand as well as his mental disability resulted from gross medical negligence, particularly, from the failure to diagnose the applicant’s condition in a timely
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1209JUD002863118
9 décembre 2025
The SAC held that this ground for appeal “was, in any case, based on the unfulfilled condition of timely and proper invocation and substantiation of a relevant acquittal judgment that was also final” and
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1109JUD001737820
9 novembre 2023
On 17 April 2020 the applicant filed an urgent request with the Naples judge responsible for the execution of sentences ( magistrato di sorveglianza ) on the basis of the risks posed by COVID
7ème chambre
DTA_2400365_20260128
28 janvier 2026
Grand, rapporteur public, et les observations de Me Baysan, substituant Me Tirard-Rouxel, représentant la SNC Cogedim Paris Métropole.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0316DEC004066398
16 mars 1999
to recover the amount of MDL 327,474 from company F., representing MDL 228,750 in relation to the capital contribution, MDL 86,662.50 in damages ( penalităţi ) and MDL 12,062.25 stamp duty (taxa de timbru
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0930DEC003972604
30 septembre 2014
Judicial practice concerning the re-opening of criminal proceedings on the basis of the Court’s decision – the case of Mrs L. Taktakishvili 25.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0520JUD001503402
20 mai 2010
The applicant complained that he had been unable to present his civil case on an equitable basis vis-à-vis the opposite party, Mr O.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0717JUD003619915
17 juillet 2018
The Government noted that all basic needs were covered free of charge and the tuck shop – which sold items at wholesale price – only provided the possibility of purchasing items over and above the basic