CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-91189
9 janvier 2009
Information given by the government concerning measures taken to prevent new violations. Payment of the sums provided for in the judgment
ECLI:CEDH:001-91197
ECLI:CEDH:001-91207
Concerning the access restrictions issued in March and October 1995, and March and April 1998, the European Court considered that the applicant should have been given an opportunity to contest those access
ECLI:CEDH:001-91211
In any event, the new reform has improved remedies in that decisions must be given rapidly and in that omissions by the liquidator may be challenged;     - Right to a trial within a reasonable
ECLI:CEDH:001-91219
Given the issues in question, the County Administrative Court could not be dispensed from its obligation to hold an oral hearing (violation of Article 6, paragraph 1).   I.
ECLI:CEDH:001-81561
20 juin 2007
  The European Court found that the decision to prohibit the applicants' entry could not be considered as meeting a “pressing social need”, first, because the Governor had given no reason for his
ECLI:CEDH:001-81277
Court and then to the Court of Cassation to release the applicant, arguing that his detention was rendered unlawful by the violation of the Convention found in this case;   Welcoming the judgment given
ECLI:CEDH:001-81279
assistance on a date indicated by a bailiff must be assessed in terms of whether an alternative time or, exceptionally, day has been specified and whether reasons for not providing assistance have been given
ECLI:CEDH:001-81522
ECLI:CEDH:001-85876
27 mars 2008
ECLI:CEDH:001-85935
ECLI:CEDH:001-85941
ECLI:CEDH:001-85964
ECLI:CEDH:001-85966
ECLI:CEDH:001-85968
  Conclusions of the respondent state   The government considers that given the time elapsed since the adoption of the new Code of Civil Procedure, the problem is not likely to arise in the future
ECLI:CEDH:001-85972
ECLI:CEDH:001-85974
ECLI:CEDH:001-85976
In 2001, he was convicted at first instance, given a suspended prison sentence and banned from holding certain posts involving media management for two years.
ECLI:CEDH:001-85978
ECLI:CEDH:001-85886
become final;   Recalling that the violation of the Convention found by the Court in this case concerned the fact that the applicant could not have the assistance of a lawyer although he had been given
Page 19 sur 2452