Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-448951-449715
15 novembre 2001
15 novembre 2001
The European Court of Human Rights held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1 (right to a determination of civil rights within a reasonable time) of the European Convention
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2240099-2399148
22 janvier 2008
22 janvier 2008
The Court held unanimously that there had been no violation of Article 5 § 3 of the Convention in the cases of Bobel and Teodorski .
Source officielle3ème chambre
ECLI:FR:CECHS:2021:453289.20211209
9 décembre 2021
9 décembre 2021
Vu la procédure suivante : La société Helm AG a demandé au juge des référés du tribunal administratif de Melun, sur le fondement de l'article L. 521-1 du code de justice administrative, de suspendre l'exécution
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-3062191-3404943
23 mars 2010
23 mars 2010
In serious economic difficulty, Yiğit’s family is trying to pay the medical expenses with the help of family friends.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2214530-2372124
20 décembre 2007
20 décembre 2007
The Court held that, if the applicants so wished, Romania must ensure that the proceedings were reopened.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1343495-1402016
24 mai 2005
24 mai 2005
The Court held unanimously: that there had been a violation of Article 2 (right to life) of the European Convention on Human Rights in respect of the death of the applicants’ relatives and
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2194301-2344285
29 novembre 2007
29 novembre 2007
As the Government had not suggested that any exception for the use of force could be applied in the applicant’s case, the Court held that there had been a violation of Article 2.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0417DEC000350311
17 avril 2012
17 avril 2012
The Board held that, according to country information, the judicial system in the Kurdistan Region was functioning and that nothing suggested that the applicant would not receive help from domestic authorities
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-248472
13 janvier 2026
13 janvier 2026
In August and November 2019, the applicant company turned to the Barabás family, the owners and managing directors of Hell Energy Magyarország Kft (“Hell Energy”), a Hungarian energy drink manufacturer
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1216187-1276371
22 décembre 2004
22 décembre 2004
The Court therefore held that there had also been a violation of Article 5 § 5.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68373-68841
31 juillet 2001
31 juillet 2001
The European Court of Human Rights held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1 and awarded the applicant 100,000 French francs (FRF) for non-pecuniary damage and FRF 20,000
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-432100-432705
16 octobre 2001
16 octobre 2001
As he had failed to appear at his trial, he was tried and convicted in proceedings held in absentia .
Source officiellePRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2254958-2404024
25 janvier 2008
25 janvier 2008
The applicant, together with three other Kurdish Iraqi detainees who had been held at Oakington, applied for permission for judicial review of their detention claiming that it was unlawful under
Source officiellePRESS;HEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-507115-508479
27 février 2002
27 février 2002
In its chamber judgment of 26 April 2001 the European Court of Human Rights held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial) of the European Convention on
Source officiellePRESS;HEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1568655-1641924
25 janvier 2006
25 janvier 2006
For eight years and two months – from his detention in Santé Prison on 15 August 1994 until his transfer to Saint-Maur Prison on 17 October 2002 – the applicant was held in solitary confinement.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68361-68829
13 février 2001
13 février 2001
The European Court of Human Rights, which found that the length of time during which the applicants were deprived of their liberty was not justified, held, unanimously, that there had been a violation
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-465523-466473
11 décembre 2001
11 décembre 2001
That court held that the question of recognition of the applicant church could be resolved only by the Metropolitan Church of Moldova, which had been recognised by the State and from which the applicant
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-635994-641485
22 octobre 2002
22 octobre 2002
It pointed out that it was not for the administrative courts to rule on the conditions for the implementation of a treaty and, on the basis of the Ministry’s observations, held that the applicant was not
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68393-68861
17 mai 2001
17 mai 2001
The European Court of Human Rights held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1 (right to determination of civil rights within a reasonable time) of the European Convention on Human
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68210-68678
3 août 2000
3 août 2000
The European Court of Human Rights held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 and of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention in that the applicant was deprived of his
Source officiellePage 19 sur 2571