He reiterated his argument about the lack of public hearings and alleged that he had not been summoned to the hearing of 8   September 2021 (the applicant has been on house arrest since April 2020

absence, to four years’ imprisonment and asked the police to establish his whereabouts.

The police refused and stated that the Court of Appeal had not expressed itself in any way regarding his reinstatement to his former position or about his dismissal being illegal. 14 .

  The applicant submits that the proposed permanent exclusion of his mother and by consequence his forced exile render the decision disproportionate.

his back and placed handcuffs around his wrists.

The fact that the applicant had not been legally assisted when he gave his statement to the police did not prejudice his defence – indeed in that statement he had said that the drugs were for his exclusive

Also self ‑ contradictory is his description of how his confession was recorded   (§   15).

However, the judge reaffirmed his earlier ruling.

Mr Tariq must be able to meet this case on a general basis, in particular, by disclosing and describing his relationship and the nature and extent of his association with those of his relatives suspected

of his visual impairment. 16 .

He reiterated his willingness to cooperate with the investigation and, referring to his diabetes, expressed his fear that in detention his health would deteriorate.

    Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence. 2.

Moreover, they claim that the applicant’s HIV infection cannot be considered to have changed since 1995 so as to render his subsequent requests to the Government for revocation of his expulsion order a

By withdrawing and transferring money on his own motion to settle his claims against his employer at that time instead of enforcing them in court, the applicant had negligently handled the assets of others

a coherent account of his actions.

He had bruises on his head and abrasions on his wrists. When she visited him in IK-14 his face was bruised, he was dragging his leg behind him and had difficulty sitting down.

However, the court considered that, in view of his young age, M. had not yet attained the degree of maturity necessary to render it appropriate to take account of his views; in this respect it relied on

his complaints were not supported by evidence. 15.

made in his medical file.