CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0623DEC000621807
23 juin 2015
    60901/10 30/09/2010 Sergiy Anatoliyovych KULYK 15/12/1968 Kyiv Sokal Court, 28/12/2009 quashed by the Lviv Administrative Court of Appeal on 28/11/2011   Obligation to pay the applicant
PRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:003-1802271-1890577
29 septembre 2006
Hongrie (n o 14962/03) Kuril c. Slovaquie (n o 63959/00)     Jeudi 5 octobre 2006   Klasen c.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0913DEC006040800
13 septembre 2001
  The applicant's father was subjected to repressions in 1929-1930 as a rich peasant (“kulak”).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0828DEC004148404
28 août 2007
Furthermore, it has already had occasion to address complaints related to alleged breach of one’s right to a hearing within a reasonable time in cases against the Slovak Republic (see, for example, Kuril
2è chambre
6a16ce9dcdc6046d47180469
26 mai 2026
QUATRE VINGT SIX CENTIMES TTC (73,86€), RETENU à l'audience du VINGT QUATRE MARS DEUX MILLE VINGT SIX , où siégeaient, Monsieur Marc BELBENOIT, président, Madame Danielle MOREAU et Monsieur Stéphane KUBIK
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1108DEC005893511
8 novembre 2016
In those circumstances the Court agrees that the authorities could have assessed the risk associated with his release from prison as high (see, mutatis mutandis ,   Kubiak v Poland , no. 2900/11,
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0704JUD005444607
4 juillet 2017
Igorevich RESIN 29/07/1974 Lozvinskiy Sverdlovsk Region Andrey Aleksandrovich MOLOSTOV 30              35559/12 02/05/2012 Sergey Stepanovich KULIDA
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0523DEC001311405
23 mai 2017
law to enable a company to challenge the truth, and limit the damage, of allegations which risk harming its reputation (see Steel and Morris v. the United Kingdom , no. 68416/01, § 94, ECHR 2005-II; Kuliś
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0619DEC001408103
19 juin 2007
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:001-148975
4 décembre 2014
KRAWCZAK 04/10/2005 04/01/2006 34097/96 KREPS 26/07/2001 26/10/2001 12786/02 KROWIAK 16/10/2007 16/01/2008 38018/07 KRZYSZTOFIAK 20/04/2010 20/07/2010 16535/02 KUBICZ 28/03/2006 28/06/2006 12848/03 KUBIK
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0517DEC004468422
17 mai 2023
Józsefné KOVÁCS 1967 László Zoltán KOVÁCS 1971 Katinka Ildikó KOVÁCSNÉ MURA-MÉSZÁROS 1961 István KÖVESDI 1951 István Lajosné KRISTON 1949 Zsuzsanna KRISTON-BODNÁR 1959 Adrienn KRIZSOVENSZKI 1983 Alexandra KULICS-BENE
18° chambre 1ère section
66a297b380b1d994348a61f0
25 juillet 2024
locaux à usage de bureaux, l'indemnité d'éviction est limitée aux indemnités accessoires correspondant aux frais normaux de déménagement et de réinstallation ; qu’elle produit un devis de la société KUBIK
Cour d'Appel
6253cdd3bd3db21cbdd949d2
20 août 2020
EXPOSE DU LITIGE : La SCI R2D2 a confié à la société Kubik et à la SARL AMENA INGENIERIE (Amena) des travaux d'aménagement d'une école de prothésistes dentaires située [...].
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2792801-3069636
16 juillet 2009
Turkey (no. 6094/03) The applicants, Çimen Işık, Hadi Elçiçek, Kulink Sevilgen and Salih Tuğrul, are Turkish nationals who were born in 1979, 1968, 1961 and 1956 respectively.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0916JUD000664814
16 septembre 2021
  10493/12, §   45, 27   November   2014; Kulik v. Ukraine , no.   10397/10, §   59, 19   March   2015; and Yaroshovets and Others v. Ukraine , nos.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1104JUD002025104
4 novembre 2008
extending detention on remand precludes any substantive examination of the justification for continuing detention and is per se sufficient for finding a violation of Article 5 § 3 (see, mutatis mutandis , Kubik
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-227989
7 septembre 2023
Court 17/05/2021 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings   55450/21 08/11/2021 Polina Alekseyevna KURILO
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0109JUD005401207
9 janvier 2020
ECLI:CEDH:001-110580
24 février 2012
Arial; font-style:italic } .sC36188E4 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:24pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:center; page-break-after:avoid } FIFTH SECTION Application no. 34515/04 Sergey Anatolyevich KULIK
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0911DEC003249405
11 septembre 2007
Furthermore, it has already had occasion to   address complaints related to alleged breach of one’s right to a hearing within a reasonable time in cases against the Slovak Republic (see, for example, Kuril
Page 19 sur 25
BODACC temporairement indisponible. Les annonces n’ont pas pu être vérifiées. Les résultats de jurisprudence restent consultables.