(b)    Subsequent proceedings before the Örebro District Court 32.

That decision was upheld by the Plovdiv District Court on 25 June 2004. II. RELEVANT DOMESTIC LAW 14.

The district court then commissioned an expert report on the financial state of the applicant. 5.

On 8 November 2010 the applicant was taken to the Oktyabrsky District Court of Poltava (hereinafter – the District Court), which ordered his detention for up to ten days in order to collect further information

  3 of the Volsk District of the Saratov Region Suspension of a driving licence for a year 12   May 2016, Volsk District Court of the Saratov Region Refusal to undergo a breathalyser test 16

Relying on Article 6 § 2 of the Convention, the applicant alleged that the District Court had violated the principle of presumption of innocence.

On 30 July 1998 the applicant was admitted to the Novoodessky District Hospital.

    On an unspecified date the Zavodsky District Court of Zaporizhzhya (“the District Court”) gave an unspecified decision on the claim of the applicant’s former husband, Z., lodged against the

The applicant submits that most residents of the district left for safer areas.

The District Court did not identify any of his assets.

The District Court finally considered that the applicant would have been free to label the applicant’s actions as “reprehensible” or as “immoral”.

  13284/87, 15 October 1987, and Philis v. Greece , no. 28970/95, 17   October 1996).

The request was submitted by mail and was received at the District Court on 20 September 2010. 13.

    On 28 September 2010 the Karabulakskiy District Court, Republic of Ingushetia (“the District Court”), granted the prosecutor’s action.

    On 9 November 2007 the Savelovskiy District Court of Moscow (“the District Court”) delivered its judgment.

  He further alleges that on 7 May 1994 Selim Orhan and other villagers went to Kulp and complained about the incident to the Kulp District Gendarme Commander, who gave the villagers permission to

    On 3 August 2000 the Leninsky District Court of Zaporizhzhya remitted the case to the prosecution service for additional investigation. 18.

    On 20 December 2001 the Supreme Court sent the applicant’s case for examination to the Obolonskyy District Court of Kyiv. 12.

Stephen Phillips   Rait Maruste Deputy Registrar   President ANNEX   No. Appl.