The complaints would have fallen to be examined, respectively, under Article 1 of Protocol No.   1 and Article 6 § 1 of the Convention.

The domestic court appears to have resumed the proceedings of its own volition and without any motion on the part of the applicant.

Zupančič,   Angelika Nußberger, judges, and Stephen Phillips, Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 10 January 2005, Having regard to the comments submitted by

Demande relative aux murs, haies et fosses mitoyens Grosse délivrée à SCP CHABAUD DURAND MARQUET, avoué COUR D'APPEL DE LIMOGES CHAMBRE CIVILE DEUXIÈME SECTION ---= = oOo = =--- ARRÊT DU 13 NOVEMBRE

Zupančič,   Helena Jäderblom, judges, and Stephen Phillips, Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 12 November 2008, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE

  Failure by a party to attend an appeal hearing when he or she had been duly notified of its date, time and place could not have prevented the appeal court to proceed with the examination of the

COMPLAINTS The applicant complained under Articles 6 § 1 and 13 of the Convention that the length of the proceedings had been excessive and that she did not have effective remedies in that respect.

ARRÊT Contradictoire, prononcé par mise à disposition au greffe le 04 Mai 2022, signé par Monsieur Philippe COULANGE, Président et Madame Maria FREDON, greffière auquel la minute de la décision a été

    Have the applicants exhausted the domestic remedies in respect of their complaints under Article 6 and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention?   2.

The applicants have not claimed non-pecuniary damage. 10.

The applicant could have requested the judges to step down if he had had any doubt as to their impartiality and independence.

exercice, demeurant [Adresse 2] représentée par Me Françoise BOULAN de la SELARL BOULAN CHERFILS IMPERATORE, avocat au barreau d'AIX-EN-PROVENCE, assistée de Me Richard BANON de la SELARL BANON & PHILIPS

Par jugement du 1er février 2006, le Tribunal de Commerce a prononcé la liquidation judiciaire de la SARL H B LA HALLE et nommé la SELARL [I] en qualité de liquidateur judiciaire.

    On 25 September 1990 the TEE requested the adjournment of these proceedings pending the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Philis case.

pages) Numéro d'inscription au répertoire général : 12/17696 Décision déférée à la Cour : Jugement du 19 Janvier 2012 -Tribunal de Grande Instance de PARIS - RG n° 06/12923 APPELANTE SAS HALLES

According to them the applicant should have proposed the State Prosecutor to lodge a request for protection of legality under Section 169 of the Minor Offences Act which could have achieved the modification

, an absolute right to have his claim determined by the criminal court.

    Article 4 § 1 of the Civil Code of 1994 reads: “Provisions of civil legislation shall have no retroactive effect and shall be applied to legal relationships which have arisen after [the provisions

There have, accordingly, been violations of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention. 23.

The order of precedence depends on the date of registration (on the list of those, who have a priority right for housing). ...”