CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1213DEC002824410
13 décembre 2011
inline-block } THIRD SECTION DECISION Application nos. 28244/10 and 32224/11 Nawzad Anwar Rashid BETWATA KHOUSHNAUW against the Netherlands The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting
Page 19 sur 2681
PRESS;ADMISSIBILITYDECISIONS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2995527-3301448
20 janvier 2010
The applicant, arrested and charged under Section 112 of the Road Traffic Act 1961, first appeared before the Dublin District Court, sitting as the Children Court, and then, in view of the nature
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-144076
17 avril 2014
By a judgment of 2 June 2008 the Iaşi County Court, sitting as a bench of two judges, dismissed the appeal. The applicant lodged an appeal on points of law ( recurs ) against this judgment.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0104DEC005833600
4 janvier 2007
228.11pt; display:inline-block } FOURTH SECTION FINAL DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 58336/00 by Kemal AKYÜZ against Turkey The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0906DEC000198907
6 septembre 2007
:228.11pt; display:inline-block } THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 1989/07 by Carmen Emilia ROJAS ARENAS and Others against the Netherlands The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0915DEC000724509
15 septembre 2009
margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } THIRD SECTION DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 7245/09 by “BLONDJE” against the Netherlands The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting
2EME ET 7EME SOUS-SECTIONS REUNIES
CETAT:CETATEXT000008177683
30 avril 2004
Article 3 : La commune de Sillingy est condamnée à payer à la caisse primaire d'assurance maladie de Haute-Savoie une indemnité de 20 413,76 euros.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1218JUD002660202
18 décembre 2008
In September 1998 the applicant successfully applied for the removal of the judge sitting in his case.
Cour d'Appel
6253cd95bd3db21cbdd93c1c
7 février 2017
C/ Robert Y... ès- qualités de Commissaire à l'exécution du plan de la SA LES POMPES FUNEBRES DE LA BALME DE SILLINGY, SA LES POMPTE FUNEBRES DE AL BALME DE SILLINGY Décision déférée à la Cour : Jugement
Tribunal Administratif de Grenoble
DTA_2400680_20240214
14 février 2024
Toutefois, par l'arrêté contesté du 3 octobre 2023, l'adjoint au maire de la commune de Sillingy s'est opposé à la réalisation des travaux déclarés.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0527DEC000568402
27 mai 2008
228.11pt; display:inline-block } THIRD SECTION FINAL DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 5684/02 by Seyithan ALPAR against Turkey The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting
ECLI:CEDH:001-111296
15 mai 2012
On 17 December 1999 the Higher Labour and Social Court, sitting in a panel of three judges, which included judge M.K., upheld N.N.’s appeal and ordered the applicant company to reinstate her, as it held
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1128JUD005413507
28 novembre 2017
Turkey, The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Committee composed of: Ledi Bianku, President, Paul Lemmens, Jon Fridrik Kjølbro, judges, and Hasan Bakırcı
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0116DEC005192414
16 janvier 2018
On 28 March 2014 the Dnipro Administrative Court of Appeal (“the Court of Appeal”), also sitting in camera , allowed the pension authorities’ appeal, quashed the judgment and dismissed the
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0515DEC003904697
15 mai 2001
On 18 March 1996 the Linz Regional Court, sitting with a single judge, acquitted the applicant of fornication, convicted him of the two other charges and sentenced him to one year’s imprisonment.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1128JUD005866109
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0412DEC003367502
12 avril 2007
2845, provided that one of the three members of the bench sitting in State Security Courts had to be a military judge.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0923DEC000934819
23 septembre 2025
By an interlocutory judgment of 14 May 2018, the Court of Cassation, sitting as a bench which did not include M.P., dismissed the recusal request.
ECLI:CEDH:001-229231
2 novembre 2023
This part of the applications has been struck out of the Court’s list of cases or declared inadmissible by the Court, sitting in a single-judge formation, assisted by a rapporteur as provided for in Article
3ème sous-section jugeant seule
CETAT:CETATEXT000021031765
26 août 2009
Article 2 : La COMMUNE DE LA BALME DE SILLINGY versera à Mme A la somme de 3 000 euros au titre de l'article L. 761-1 du code de justice administrative.