In the leading cases of Andrey Smirnov v. Russia, no. 43149/10, §§   35 ‑ 57, 13 February 2018, Resin v. Russia, no. 9348/14, 18 December 2018, Chaldayev v.

03/2018 Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 3,500     50049/18 10/10/2018 Pavel Yuryevich SMIRNOV

applicants’ confinement in a metal cage or a glass cabin on the exercise of their rights to participate effectively in the proceedings and to receive practical and effective legal assistance; Andrey Smirnov

  71757/13 Igor Yevgenyevich SMIRNOV against Russia and 15 other applications (see list appended) PROCEDURAL INFORMATION Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications

unfair trial in administrative offence proceedings - inability to examine police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based   45675/18* 19/09/2018 Ivan Gennadyevich SMIRNOV

  46468/06, § 216, 22 December 2008; and Smirnov v. Russia , no.   71362/01, § 47, 7 June 2007). 44.

  France , 25 February 1993, §   57, Series A no. 256 ‑ A; Niemietz , cited above, § 37; and Smirnov v. Russia , no.

Smaro D. Peksara,   3. Anestis P. Pagaltsos,   4. Apostolis P. Pagaltsos,   5. Assimi P. Pagaltsou, 6. Martha P. Pagaltsou,   7. Georgios C. Papadopoulos ou Iosifides, 8.

    In these circumstances, the Court makes no award under Article 41 of the Convention (see Smirnov   v. Russia , no.

absconding; failure to examine the possibility of applying other measures of restraint; collective detention orders     2,700     9197/20 11/02/2020 Dina Sergeyevna KIBETS 1983 Smirnov

Encore faut-il que ce contrôle soit efficace dans les circonstances particulières de l’affaire en cause ( Smirnov c. Russie , n o 71362/01, §   45, 7   juin 2007).

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 4,000     9625/23 15/02/2023 Gennadiy Aleksandrovich SMIRNOV

a lawyer is involved, an encroachment upon professional secrecy may have repercussions on the proper administration of justice and hence on the rights guaranteed by Article 6 of the Convention (see Smirnov

30.04.2001 – 12.10.2004 1,300 29 Tkachenko Ivan Ivanovich “Krasnoluchska” mine 3,675 04.04.2001 – 02.11.2004 1,300 30 Sedayev Sergey Vasiliyevich “Izvestiy” mine 4,021 25.08.1999 – 21.10.2004 2,100 31 Smirnov

region   26/11/2017 article 20.2 § 2 of CAO administrative fine of RUB 20,000 the Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court 18/01/2018   3,500     55824/21 05/11/2021 Konstantin Sergeyevich SMIRNOV

    An interference with a prisoner’s right to respect for his family life does not need to amount to an outright ban on family visits (see, for example, Andrey Smirnov v.

court in civil matters, constitutes one aspect only; however, it is an aspect that makes it in fact possible to benefit from the further guarantees laid down in paragraph 1 of Article 6 (see Sergey Smirnov

m² lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, overcrowding, poor quality of food, no or restricted access to running water, lack of fresh air 9,000   3774/18 30/12/2017 Aleksandr Aleksandrovich SMIRNOV

The third applicant, Patrick Smirnov, is the first and second applicants’ child: he was born in Ireland in July 2002 and therefore holds an Irish passport.

  41461/10, §§   101-11, 27 November 2012, concerning the excessive length of pre-trial detention; Andrey Smirnov v. Russia , no.   43149/10, 13   February 2018, Resin v.