André, 4° C... Gérard, 5° J...

30 of the Convention). 4.

He relied on Articles   3 and 13 of the Convention, which read as follows: Article 3 (prohibition of torture) “No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment

le non-respect d'une procédure de constatation d'achèvement des travaux ne saurait affecter que la réclamation de la tranche de prix due à la livraison, mais non celle des tranches correspondant aux stades

    The applicant alleged a violation of Article 5 § 4 of the Convention, both taken alone and in conjunction with Article 13 of the Convention, in the proceedings concerning his applications

    ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF ARTICLE 3 OF THE CONVENTION 65.

He invokes Article 10 of the Convention. 5.

not determined by the original judgment – the fact remained that, outside of proceedings instituted pursuant to the “infringement procedure” under Article 46 §§   4 and 5 of the Convention, the Court

COMPLAINTS The applicant complained under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, Article 4 of Protocol No. 7, and Article 8 of the Convention, taken alone and together with Article 14 of the Convention.

It follows that this complaint is manifestly ill-founded and must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 and 4 of the Convention. 3.

It follows that this complaint is manifestly ill-founded and must be rejected in accordance with Article   35 §§   3 and   4 of the Convention. 3.

THE LAW ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 §§ 1 and 3 ( d ) OF THE CONVENTION 26.

    The applicant alleges that the criminal proceedings brought against him exceeded a reasonable time, invoking Article 6 § 1 of the Convention. 4.

It follows that this complaint must be rejected in accordance with Article   35 §§ 3 and 4 of the Convention. 2.

COMPLAINTS Relying on Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, the applicant complains that the domestic criminal proceedings were not fair.

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 3 OF THE CONVENTION 57 .

    It follows that this complaint is manifestly ill-founded and must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 (a) and 4 of the Convention. B.

xa0; 1 and Article   47 of the Convention.

The Court further observes that Article 6 does not give a right to have criminal proceedings terminated on account of the accused’s state of health.