When she had asked the applicant what he had been doing there he stated that he had been looking for another person and left.

The applicant had not previously had any contact with the physician at the local health care centre who had ordered her examination.

  It had belonged to the Polish State until the Second World War.

Since the fourth most senior Vice-President of the Court of Cassation was not present at the hearing of 11 June 1997 it had to be assumed that he could not participate and had to be replaced by the fifth

Since the fourth most senior Vice-President of the Court of Cassation was not present at the hearing of 18 June 1997 it had to be assumed that he could not participate and had to be replaced by the sixth

  The Court found that the applicant, on two occasions, had deliberately taken the municipal bus without having had a ticket.

He also found, inter alia, that the victim had alleged that he had sustained facial injuries during the assault upon him and that that evidence had been confirmed by a medical doctor who examined the victim

VILA AMIGÓ     Mrs   M. HION     Mr   R. NICOLINI           PART I       STATEMENT OF THE FACTS     7.

He also found, inter alia, that the victim had alleged that he had sustained facial injuries during the assault upon him and that that evidence had been confirmed by a medical doctor who examined the victim

Moreover, [the applicant] has stated that she had a passport in her home country which was confiscated by the revolutionary guards in connection with her arrest in June 1995.

  He alleged that his uncle had been arrested and had "disappeared" in May 1996.

letter of 19 December 1997 the Government confirmed that a cheque had been sent to the applicant for the amount claimed by the applicant, and that payment of his solicitor's costs as submitted had been

His representative also confirmed that the applicant had not been in touch with him since he had changed address and stated that he had to assume that the applicant was no longer interested in pursuing

In the Hämeenlinna County Prison the nursing staff had given instructions to the kitchen staff in view of the problems which the regular prison menu had caused the applicant.

Workmen had been carrying out work in the area. Ms.

5:42 had not yet acquired legal force.

X also had plans for the future of the child. It was also noted that, as the parents had arguments with each other, there was no basis for joint custody.

he had given to the court to pay the school fees and for professional misconduct in that he had failed to provide comments on the complaint lodged against him by the school, although the Bar Council had

VILA AMIGÓ              Ms.    M.-T.