font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic }   Communicated on 19 March 2019   SECOND SECTION Application no. 6431/14 Alexandra

She asked the same of all the eyewitnesses, and repeated her request while she was on the ship and when she was physically thrown off the ship, but during all that time she never mentioned any criminal

However, by letter dated 16 March 2011 the applicant informed the Court that she wanted to withdraw the application.

  In the case of Alexandrou v.

She died on 5 July 2010. She was represented before the Court by Mr M. Mančev, a lawyer practising in Kavadarci. The Macedonian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr K.

The Court notes that the applicant neither informed the Court of any change of her postal address nor did she indicate any provisional address at which communication with her could be effected.

She complained under Article 6 of the Convention that she had been denied the opportunity to have knowledge of and comment on evidence submitted by the opposing party on which the domestic courts had based

She also alleged errors on the facts and law, lack of impartiality and insufficient reasoning. Furthermore, she complained under Article 13 of the Convention about the outcome of the proceedings.

She was represented before the Court by Ms O.A. Sadovskaya, a lawyer practising in Nizhniy Novgorod. The Russian Government (“the Government”) were represented by Mr   G.

She further complained under Article 5 § 4 of the Convention that she had not been allowed to participate in court hearings concerning her appeals against the placement and prolongation of her detention

CASSATION, CHAMBRE COMMERCIALE, FINANCIERE ET ECONOMIQUE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Attendu, selon l'arrêt confirmatif attaqué, que le navire "Multitank Arcadia" appartenant à la société de droit allemand

She also alleged that she would be at risk of further trafficking. Her application was refused. 6.     The applicant was served with an order for deportation in June 2012.

COUR D'APPEL D'AIX EN PROVENCE 11o Chambre A ARRÊT AU FOND DU 18 SEPTEMBRE 2009 No 2009 / 517 Rôle No 07 / 20247 Sheng Shi Y... C / Christiane Z... épouse A...

On 21 January 2011 the applicant informed the Court that she had not been able to find counsel either in Alexandria or in Bucharest, as all lawyers allegedly refused to take her case.

accepting a friendly settlement of the case, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The applicant, Ms Vjera Solar, is a Croatian national, who was born in 1939 and lives in Sisak She

Zubco v. the Republic of Moldova and Russia 49508/15 19/09/2015 Alexandru ZUBCO 1985 Chișinău Moldovan   Alexandru POSTICĂ The applicant was born in the “MRT” and is a member of a non-governmental

sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both }   Communicated on 4 July 2018   FIRST SECTION Application no. 50417/13 Alexandra

  4)   D’Alessandro v.

She was represented before the Court by Ms N. Madre de Deus, a lawyer practising in Baixa da Banheira. The Portuguese Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mrs M.