CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

112 résultats pour « Article 238 bis HE Code général des impôts »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-113354

Admin. suprême

6 septembre 2012

6 septembre 2012

The article stated that Mr A had been afraid to reveal the identity of the man he claimed had actually been behind the importation, and that he feared for his own and his family’s safety.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1003JUD006198512

Admin. suprême

3 octobre 2019

3 octobre 2019

under Article 239 of the Criminal Code and of coercion under Article 240 of the Criminal Code. ...

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-112346

Admin. suprême

31 août 2010

31 août 2010

In view of the above, and having regard to application of Article 4(a) of the Criminal Code of BiH in conjunction with Article 7 paragraph 1 of the European Convention, the Constitutional Court concludes

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0625DEC007391116

Admin. suprême

25 juin 2019

25 juin 2019

    Law no. 17/2012 of 27 December 2012 on the State General Budget Law for 2013 introduced Article 3 bis to Law no. 29/2011.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0523JUD006749610

Admin. suprême

23 mai 2017

23 mai 2017

235 bis CIC), and that no irregularities had been committed in implementing the special investigative methods (see Article 235 ter CIC). 20.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0304JUD001864010

Admin. suprême

4 mars 2014

4 mars 2014

    Mr Gabetti submits that on 23 August 2005 he was in hospital in the United States.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1020DEC003182702

Admin. suprême

20 octobre 2010

20 octobre 2010

He alleged a violation of Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 to the Convention. 14.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0703JUD003205109

Admin. suprême

3 juillet 2012

3 juillet 2012

    The suspension of the pronouncement of the judgment is regulated by Article 231 of the Code on Criminal Procedure (Law no. 5271), the relevant paragraphs of which read as follows: Article

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1115DEC003180396

Admin. suprême

15 novembre 2001

15 novembre 2001

Procedure) or, in the alternative, that he had stated his opinion on the facts of the case before the end of the proceedings (Article 37 para. 1 (b) of the same Code).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1213DEC004158598

Admin. suprême

13 décembre 2005

13 décembre 2005

At the outset of the hearing presiding judge P.K. handed him a copy of the Court of Appeal’s aforementioned decision and asked whether he wished to pursue an allegation of bias, which he had raised concerning

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0617DEC003908402

Admin. suprême

17 juin 2008

17 juin 2008

the car in violation of Article 113 of the Customs Code.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0118JUD001550815

Admin. suprême

18 janvier 2022

18 janvier 2022

Article 520 bis “1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0406DEC002086492

Admin. suprême

6 avril 1995

6 avril 1995

offence under Article 153 of the Criminal Code rather that under Article 133.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1211JUD000065516

Admin. suprême

11 décembre 2018

11 décembre 2018

and § 2 (a) of the Criminal Code, with reference to Article 138 (a) of the Criminal Code. 26 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0226JUD002927195

Admin. suprême

26 février 2002

26 février 2002

Since the applicants had failed to prove the truth of these facts, they could not rely on Article 10 of the Convention. 23.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1212JUD001579820

Admin. suprême

12 décembre 2023

12 décembre 2023

, or if he or she persistently avoids the protective supervision referred to in Article 61 of this Code, or if he or she, without a justified reason, breaches the obligations imposed on him or her by the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0201DEC002059302

Admin. suprême

1 février 2005

1 février 2005

    He complained that he did not have sufficient access to the case-file. e.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0119JUD001752610

Admin. suprême

19 janvier 2016

19 janvier 2016

did not commit another wilful offence for a period of three years in accordance with Article   231 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Law no. 5271) and Article   23 of the Code of Juvenile Protection

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-161785

Admin. suprême

3 mars 2016

3 mars 2016

First, his appeal did satisfy the admissibility criteria under Article 237 § 1 b) of the Code of Civil Procedure then in force, which allowed an appeal of law against an appellate court’s judgment reply

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0616JUD001307903

Admin. suprême

16 juin 2009

16 juin 2009

    The applicant alleged, in particular, that the imposition of a fuel fee debit after he had been fined for petty tax fraud constituted double jeopardy in breach of Article 4 of Protocol No

Source officielle

Page 2 sur 6

← PrécédentSuivant →