CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-113354
6 septembre 2012
The article stated that Mr A had been afraid to reveal the identity of the man he claimed had actually been behind the importation, and that he feared for his own and his family’s safety.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1003JUD006198512
3 octobre 2019
under Article 239 of the Criminal Code and of coercion under Article 240 of the Criminal Code. ...
ECLI:CEDH:001-112346
31 août 2010
In view of the above, and having regard to application of Article 4(a) of the Criminal Code of BiH in conjunction with Article 7 paragraph 1 of the European Convention, the Constitutional Court concludes
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0625DEC007391116
25 juin 2019
    Law no. 17/2012 of 27 December 2012 on the State General Budget Law for 2013 introduced Article 3 bis to Law no. 29/2011.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0523JUD006749610
23 mai 2017
235 bis CIC), and that no irregularities had been committed in implementing the special investigative methods (see Article 235 ter CIC). 20.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0304JUD001864010
4 mars 2014
    Mr Gabetti submits that on 23 August 2005 he was in hospital in the United States.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1020DEC003182702
20 octobre 2010
He alleged a violation of Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 to the Convention. 14.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0703JUD003205109
3 juillet 2012
    The suspension of the pronouncement of the judgment is regulated by Article 231 of the Code on Criminal Procedure (Law no. 5271), the relevant paragraphs of which read as follows: Article
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1115DEC003180396
15 novembre 2001
Procedure) or, in the alternative, that he had stated his opinion on the facts of the case before the end of the proceedings (Article 37 para. 1 (b) of the same Code).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1213DEC004158598
13 décembre 2005
At the outset of the hearing presiding judge P.K. handed him a copy of the Court of Appeal’s aforementioned decision and asked whether he wished to pursue an allegation of bias, which he had raised concerning
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0617DEC003908402
17 juin 2008
the car in violation of Article 113 of the Customs Code.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0118JUD001550815
18 janvier 2022
Article 520 bis “1.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0406DEC002086492
6 avril 1995
offence under Article 153 of the Criminal Code rather that under Article 133.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1211JUD000065516
11 décembre 2018
and § 2 (a) of the Criminal Code, with reference to Article 138 (a) of the Criminal Code. 26 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0226JUD002927195
26 février 2002
Since the applicants had failed to prove the truth of these facts, they could not rely on Article 10 of the Convention. 23.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1212JUD001579820
12 décembre 2023
, or if he or she persistently avoids the protective supervision referred to in Article 61 of this Code, or if he or she, without a justified reason, breaches the obligations imposed on him or her by the
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0201DEC002059302
1 février 2005
    He complained that he did not have sufficient access to the case-file. e.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0119JUD001752610
19 janvier 2016
did not commit another wilful offence for a period of three years in accordance with Article   231 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Law no. 5271) and Article   23 of the Code of Juvenile Protection
ECLI:CEDH:001-161785
3 mars 2016
First, his appeal did satisfy the admissibility criteria under Article 237 § 1 b) of the Code of Civil Procedure then in force, which allowed an appeal of law against an appellate court’s judgment reply
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0616JUD001307903
16 juin 2009
    The applicant alleged, in particular, that the imposition of a fuel fee debit after he had been fined for petty tax fraud constituted double jeopardy in breach of Article 4 of Protocol No
Page 2 sur 6