convention"),   Having regard to the report drawn up by the European Commission of Human rights in accordance with Article 31 (art. 31) of the convention relating to the application lodged by Mr Joseph

} .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .sA8507A40 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:35.4pt; margin-bottom:0pt } Resolution CM/ResDH(2016)106 Execution of the decision of the European Court of Human Rights Joseph

It also found that there had been no violation of Article 7 of the Convention as a result of the prosecutor’s discretion to decide in which court to try the accused.

As a number of investigative opportunities have been identified and are to be followed up, the case will continue to be processed by HET, which have been put in touch with Weir by the Centre.

Had he been a woman, the applicant would not have been eligible for any widow's benefits. The applicant cannot, therefore, claim to be a victim of discrimination (see Cornwell ).

font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Communicated on 13 September 2019 and 11 December 2019 Published on 15 June 2020   THIRD SECTION Application no. 6865/19 Joseph

Case Date of the decision 38574/21 Michel Joseph PEETERS AND 6 OTHER APPLICATIONS 04/04/2024   The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 39, paragraph 4, of the Convention for the Protection

He named four loyalists as having been responsible for the attack.

regard to the observations submitted by the respondent Government, Having deliberated, decides as follows:                   THE FACTS The applicant, Mr Joseph

the report drawn up on 9 April 1997, by the European Commission of Human Rights in accordance with Article 31 of the Convention relating to the application lodged on 20 May 1994 by Ms   Marie-Josèphe

.sD6CCE070 { margin-top:6pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:35.4pt; text-align:justify; font-size:11pt } Resolution CM/ResDH(2017)346 Execution of the decision of the European Court of Human Rights Joseph

On the merits, it considered that the penalty suffered by the applicant, namely a jail term, had not been proportionate as it had not been necessary in a democratic society, and had had a chilling effect

European Commission of Human Rights in accordance with Article 31 (art. 31) of the convention relating to the applications lodged by Mr Ian Brady, Mr Arthur Hosein, Lord Avebury, Mr Steven Raymond, Mr Joseph

    The applicant is a grandson of the former Soviet leader, Joseph Stalin. 4.

He complained that the costs of the first judicial review proceedings had been awarded against him, and that the office of the Director of Public Prosecutions had sought payment of the amount.

length of certain proceedings concerning civil rights and obligations before the administrative courts;   Whereas in its report the Commission expressed, unanimously, the opinion that there had been

application against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights on 25 January 1980 under Article 25 (art. 25) of the convention by Mr Joseph

  That conclusion dispensed the Court from examining whether the applicant had also been discriminated against vis-à-vis other men who, though eligible for jury service, had never been summoned to

Since 1994 he has been the German member of the European Commission of Human Rights.     Mr Jean-Paul Costa is the French Judge.

However, no response has been received.