AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANCAIS LA COUR DE CASSATION, PREMIERE CHAMBRE CIVILE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Donne acte à la mutuelle l'Auxiliaire et à la société Boccard du désistement de leur pourvoi en

commission, était amené à relativiser son point de vue, son directeur indiquant, le 17 juin 1997, au juge d'instruction que le favoritisme ne lui apparaissait pas démontré, "l'avantage donné à Cochery Bourdin

to the Health Board. 13.

    The present application concerns Guidance published by the Parole Board (“the Board”) in March 2019, and amended in 2021, pertaining to the correct approach to take with respect to allegations

By letters of 12 January and 23 February 2004 the applicant requested that the Refugee Board acknowledge liability in damages for the suffering inflicted on him as a consequence of the Refugee Board’s

    The applicant complains under Article 6 para. 1 of the Convention that contrary to this provision no oral hearing had taken place before the Trial Board and that the Trial Board's decision

371 du Code de procédure pénale ; "en ce que le procès-verbal des débats mentionne d'une part, que lors de l'audience sur les intérêts civils "M. le président a donné successivement la parole à Me Bonnard

The Refugee Board refused his request in the absence of significant new information and the applicant was deported.

  This interim measure was refused on 7 July 1987 by the Board.   On 16 June 1989, when deciding on the merits, the Industrial Appeals Board rejected the applicant's appeal.

The court considered that although he had not been heard prior to the Board’s decision of November 1993, he had been able to appeal against the order and the Board had sent the said order for review before

The applicant contested the two officials' right to act on the Social Welfare Board's behalf and repeated his request on 9 March 1994, demanding that the matter be placed before the Board itself.

The applicant did not challenge the Board's refusal. 2.

only examine the lawfulness of the Board's decision.

  The Gaming Board (“the Board”) is a statutory body established to regulate the gaming industry in the United Kingdom under the Gaming Act 1968.

    On 6 May 2014 the Compensation Board ( Ersättningsnämnden – “the Board”) refused his application.

selon le moyen, que quelles que soient les relations du client et de la banque, celle-ci a le devoir particulier de l'informer des risques encourus dans les opérations spéculatives sur les marchés boursiers

On 16 March 1995 the Objections Board upheld the Supreme Board’s decision.

On 16 December 2005 the Board examined “an application by the Judicial Council”.

AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANCAIS LA COUR DE CASSATION, DEUXIEME CHAMBRE CIVILE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur le pourvoi formé par Monsieur BOURDA Y..., employé saisonnier, domicilié à Viella, résidant

AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANCAIS LA COUR DE CASSATION, CHAMBRE SOCIALE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur le pourvoi formé par la société Boccard, société anonyme, dont le siège social est ..., en cassation