The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.

: THE FACTS The applicants, Mrs Elena Molteni and Mr Emauele Ghisi are two Italian nationals who were respectively born in 1943 and 1972 and live in Milan.

; Marko Bošnjak,   Péter Paczolay, judges, and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 22 January 2016, Having deliberated, decides as follows

BALMAIN [Adresse 3] [Localité 6] représentées par Maître Emmanuel BAUD du PARTNERSHIPS JONES DAY, avocats au barreau de PARIS, vestiaire #J0001 DEFENDERESSES Société EURO HAIR R&D B.V.

:1.87pt; display:inline-block } .s84D0B602 { width:185.44pt; display:inline-block } .sA2E62387 { width:204.97pt; display:inline-block }   THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 14117/14 Ellen EMMANUEL

width:127.42pt; display:inline-block } .s9852CA4C { width:7.54pt; display:inline-block } .s9E436411 { width:138.09pt; display:inline-block }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 21449/05 Emanuel

text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt }   FIFTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 55970/13 Emanuel

It follows that the proceedings in question did not involve a determination of civil rights and obligations within the meaning of that provision.

It follows that this part of the application must be rejected in accordance with Article   35   §   4 of the Convention.

width:1.64pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s8934192D { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center }     FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 31805/15 Emanuel

inline-block } .s7602FED2 { width:18.21pt; display:inline-block } .s60570E66 { width:233.81pt; display:inline-block } SECOND SECTION DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 35088/97 by Emanuele

    The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.   A.

    She is represented before the Court by Mr Emanuele Bracaglia, a lawyer practising in Rome.   A.

padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s3BFE44DE { width:13.24%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 17943/16 Emanuel

center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt }     FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 40497/12 Emmanouil

xa0; Lorraine Schembri Orland , judges, and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 30   May 2014, Having deliberated, decides as follows

margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .sA4BC3E2E { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 } FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 19366/14 Conchita NICOLAO and Maria Emanuela

{ margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .sA4BC3E2E { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 27863/23 Emanuele

They relied on Article 3 of the Convention, which reads as follows: “No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.”

        The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows.