Article 5 § 4: As the applicants had been released pending examination of their applications by the Constitutional Court, the periods to be taken into consideration in assessing the “speediness” requirement

It follows, therefore, that the authorities cannot be reproached for their failure to establish the fate of the applicants’ relatives.

In particular, the high court noted that not all applicants had fallen into default at the same time and that the default interest rate applied by the Commercial Court should have been lower.

When an agent of the State, in particular a law-enforcement officer, had been convicted of a crime that violated Article   2, the granting of an amnesty or pardon should not be permissible.

    The facts of the cases, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. 6.     The applicants own plots of land.

The officer said that if the shepherds had been detained, they would be released. He eventually gave permission for the men to fetch the sheep.

    The application had been communicated to the Government . THE LAW 5.

    The addressee was to confirm whether the Orhans had been referred to the addressee to be detained.

Subsequently, the applicants have been unable to establish the whereabouts of their relatives.

It stated that her son had been taken into custody following a clash between the gendarmes and the PKK at her village and that she was concerned about his fate.

He alleged that the supervisor had been negligent in his conduct, arguing that on the day of the incident he had heard a noise but considered that something had fallen and neglected checking what had really

had not been taken into custody.

Firstly, in cases where the detention order had not been issued by a judicial authority, the subsequent review by a court had to be followed with greater speed than might otherwise be found appropriate

It stated that her son had been taken into custody following a clash between the gendarmes and the PKK at her village and she was doubtful as to his fate.

He had also stated that when the soldiers opened fire, he and Bülent Karataş had been on the road and the soldiers had been below the road down by the river bed.

    The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. 4.     The applicants all own plots of land.

Instead of chasing the terrorists on the mountains, a few microbes should be “wiped out” and the question should be put to them - “one from us, five from you: do you still wish to continue?”

For those who had given samples not yet destroyed, they had not been given any information about their use or fate. B.

    The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. 4.     The applicants all own plots of land.

They had then been warned that they would be shot at. After the firing had ceased, four grenades had been thrown at them when they fell to the ground.