CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

125 résultats pour « Faten BEN HASSINE »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CA

Chambre 1-8

697b0fcccdc6046d4712ac01

Appel

28 janvier 2026

28 janvier 2026

/ 031 N° RG 23/09209 N° Portalis DBVB-V-B7H-BLTQJ [E] [N] [C] [Z] [O] [V] C/ [I] [L] Copie exécutoire délivrée le : à : Me Faten

Source officielle
CA

Chambre 1-6

688312e69a4bcd46bcddb1a8

Appel

24 juillet 2025

24 juillet 2025

AXA FRANCE IARD Organisme CPAM DU VAR Mutualité MSA DU VAR Copie exécutoire délivrée le : à : - Me Faten BEN HASSINE - Me Danielle ROBERT Décision déférée à la

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0314DEC006887914

Admin. suprême

14 mars 2017

14 mars 2017

He had then been taken to Lora Military Prison. His further fate remains uncertain. 6.     On 5 November 1997 Croatia ratified the Convention. 7.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0916JUD002975009

Admin. suprême

16 septembre 2014

16 septembre 2014

This compound had been built by British forces and continued to be administered by them.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-118182

Admin. suprême

30 août 2011

30 août 2011

surrender himself before Tarek Hassan would be released.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0904DEC001269806

Admin. suprême

4 septembre 2007

4 septembre 2007

The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. In 1979 Mrs Nadifi Ahmen Hassan married Hassan Osman and they lived together in Mogadishu, Somalia.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-249679

Admin. suprême

16 mars 2026

16 mars 2026

Referring to Article 3 of the Convention, the applicants further complain that they have been suffering severe mental distress due to the uncertainty surrounding the fate of their relatives following their

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0603DEC005962308

Admin. suprême

3 juin 2010

3 juin 2010

The discovery of the remains disclosed that their relatives had been killed by violence and investigations should be carried out to find and punish the perpetrators.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0425DEC004136705

Admin. suprême

25 avril 2017

25 avril 2017

For practical reasons, Mr Kevork Ramses Malhas will continue to be called “the applicant” in this decision although his heirs are now to be regarded as such (see Dalban v.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-570780-573224

Admin. suprême

18 juin 2002

18 juin 2002

This fact in itself had to be considered a most serious failing since it enabled those responsible to conceal their involvement in a crime, to cover their tracks and to escape accountability for the fate

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0907DEC000986415

Admin. suprême

7 septembre 2021

7 septembre 2021

    The applicants complained about the alleged death of their new born child in a State-run hospital in 1992 and maintained that the child could in fact still be alive, having been given up

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0627DEC006668711

Admin. suprême

27 juin 2017

27 juin 2017

However, where negligence has been shown, the obligation may also be satisfied if the legal system affords victims a remedy in the civil courts, either alone or in conjunction with a remedy in the criminal

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-111076

Admin. suprême

10 avril 2012

10 avril 2012

The investigating authority had not established the place from which V. had jumped or had been pushed down and from which height, a number of actions requested by the investigator to be made by various

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-14451

Admin. suprême

8 avril 2025

8 avril 2025

If successful, the parliamentarian could be held to be in contempt of court, and there would be no constitutional obstacle to a claim for damages.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0403DEC005962308

Admin. suprême

3 avril 2012

3 avril 2012

Even though the disappearance of the persons concerned has been known since 1963-64, their actual fate was uncertain.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-248994

Admin. suprême

4 février 2026

4 février 2026

Referring to Article 3 of the Convention, the applicants further complain that they have been suffering severe mental distress due to the uncertainty surrounding the fate of their relatives following their

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0830DEC004903715

Admin. suprême

30 août 2016

30 août 2016

well be in a position to challenge that order on the ground that it had not been given by a tribunal invested by law with the necessary competence. 43.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:1023REP002253593

Admin. suprême

23 octobre 1998

23 octobre 1998

  68   The previous night, she had been home with her husband Metin Can and their friend Hasan Kaya.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0706DEC003390208

Admin. suprême

6 juillet 2021

6 juillet 2021

been given up for adoption unlawfully.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0228DEC004320706

Admin. suprême

28 février 2017

28 février 2017

For practical reasons, Fikri Vural will continue to be called “the applicant” in this decision although his heirs are now to be regarded as such (see Dalban v.

Source officielle

Page 1 sur 7

Suivant →