supérieur à trois fois le minimum INPS pour les années 2012 et 2013, après l’arrêt de la Cour constitutionnelle n o   70/2015 qui a déclaré inconstitutionnelle la norme prévue dans la loi dite “Fornero

Recalling that the case originated in an application (No. 39110/97) against Portugal, lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights on 16 December 1997 under former Article 25 of the Convention by Ms Giselle

notification of the judgments;   Recalling that Rule 44, paragraph 2, of the Rules of the Court provides that the striking out of a case shall be effected by means of a judgment which the President shall forward

notification of the judgments;   Recalling that Rule 44, paragraph 2, of the Rules of the Court provides that the striking out of a case shall be effected by means of a judgment which the President shall forward

    As regards applications nos. 50926/09 and 7480/10 , the applicants were represented by Mr Giuseppe Ferraro, a lawyer practising in Naples. 3.

    DH(97)156 31635/96 ANFOSSO     DH(97)614 44413/98 ANGELO GIUSEPPE GUERRERA 28/02/2002 28/05/2002   24162/94 ANGELONE AND / ET CELESTE     DH(96)472 47785/99 ANGEMI

    DH(97)156 31635/96 ANFOSSO     DH(97)614 44413/98 ANGELO GIUSEPPE GUERRERA 28/02/2002 28/05/2002   24162/94 ANGELONE AND / ET CELESTE     DH(96)472 47785/99 ANGEMI

  In their second ground of appeal Mr De Haes and Mr Gijsels complained of a violation of Articles 8 and 10 of the Convention (art. 8, art.   10).

notification of the judgments;   Recalling that Rule 44, paragraph 2, of the Rules of the Court provides that the striking out of a case shall be effected by means of a judgment which the President shall forward

against the Italian Republic lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the   Convention”) by an Italian national, Mr Giuseppe

Giuseppe Baggetta, who is an Italian national, on 25 January 1983.

They claimed that, even though they had put forward a motion to hold a public meeting, the Local Council had failed to hold a public consultation on the matter.

  It originated in an application (no. 24295/94) against the Italian Republic lodged with the Commission under Article 25 (art. 25) by two Italian nationals, Mr Giuseppe Zappia and his wife Giuseppa

Italy (no. 59638/00)   Violation of Article 8 Giovanni Bastone and Giuseppe Campisi are Italian nationals who were born in 1943 and 1960 respectively.

    Dommage   Frais et dépens      moral (1)     Angelo Giuseppe Guerrera c.

Giuseppe Viola, President of the Criminal Chamber of the Regional Court, and Mr.

) against the Republic of Croatia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by an Italian national, Mr Giuseppe

Norway [GC], no. 21980/93 , § 58, ECHR   1999-III; De Haes and Gijsels v. Belgium , 24 February 1997, § 37, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997 ‑ I; and Jersild v.

    The applicant put forward a witness who claimed to have heard about a meeting that was held on the Old Airport Square.

On 22   October 2004 the report, as amended by Mr Oran in line with the comments put forward by members of the Consultative Council at the meeting on 1 October 2004, was submitted to the Deputy Prime