The protocol noted, inter alia , the widow's undertaking to provide an expert opinion on the property falling within the estate.

    Hardiman J described in detail the legal status of National Schools.

Accordingly, the Court concludes that there was no appropriate and effective remedy which the applicants should have exercised for the purposes of Article 35 § 1 of the Convention (see Hartman v. the Czech

déférée à la Cour : Jugement du 10 Mai 2021 -Conseil de Prud'hommes - Formation paritaire d'AUXERRE - RG n° F19/00105 APPELANT Monsieur [K] [N] [G] [Adresse 2] [Localité 4] Représenté par Me Fabien

O'Boyle , Section Registrar , Having regard to the above application lodged on 10 January 2003, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The applicant, Mr Allar Harkmann, was born in 1955 and

1] [Localité 1] Représenté par Me Florence FREDJ-CATEL de la SELAS B.C.D.AVOCATS, avocat au barreau de MEAUX INTIMÉE SAS BDMS DISTRIBUTION [Adresse 2] [Localité 2] Représentée par Me Fabien

The existence of the remedies in question must be sufficiently certain not only in theory but also in practice, failing which they will lack the requisite accessibility and effectiveness.

The existence of the remedies in question must be sufficiently certain not only in theory but also in practice, failing which they will lack the requisite accessibility and effectiveness (see Horvat v.

    The Government finally argued that, by failing to avail himself of any of the above-mentioned legal avenues, the applicant had not exhausted the domestic remedies as required by Article 35

Case of Ayşe Harman The applicant lived in the village of Yolçatı. When the firing stopped at 5 a.m on 13 May 1994, the applicant fled from the village.

On 5   November 1997 Harman J. handed down the High Court’s judgment.

constituted a remedy of which applicants must avail themselves in cases where they complained that the length of proceedings had caused them the financial losses (see, a contrario for non-pecuniary damage, Hartman

At minimum there is a reasonable likelihood that interception and processing ... has taken place and continues to take place ( Hewitt and Harman v. UK , 12175/86, EComHR Report 9.5.89, paras. 26-32).

, avocat au barreau de BORDEAUX, SA ALLIANT, prise en la personne de son représentant légal domicilié en cette qualité au siège social 87 Rue Richelieu - 75002 PARIS, représentée par Maître Fabien

Ce magistrat a rendu compte des plaidoiries dans le délibéré de la Cour, entendu en son rapport, composée de : Madame Isabelle LECOQ-CARON, Présidente de chambre, Madame Anne HARTMANN, Présidente de

Three of them (Hardiman, Fennelly and O’Donnell JJ) allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court order surrendering the applicant to the Hungarian authorities. 15.

1946   Emilné FÁBIÁN 1941   Gábor József FÁBIÁN 1954   Lívia FALLYNÉ NAGY 1964   Tamás FARAGÓ 1978   Csaba FARKAS 1964   Ferencné FARKAS 1936   Györgyné FARKAS 1948

On 5   November 1997 Harman J. handed down the High Court’s judgment.

  The Court further noted that, by failing to comply with the judgment in question, the national authorities prevented the applicant from having the occupants evicted and from taking possession of