CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1974:0527REP000561472
27 mai 1974
No violation Art. 11 para. 1;No violation Art. 11 read in conjunction with Art. 14;No Violation Art. 13
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-3125
5 octobre 2006
Conclusion :violation of Article   11 read in the light of Article   9 (unanimously). Article   41 – EUR 10,000 for non-pecuniary damage.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1005JUD007288101
    The articles of association of the applicant branch, approved on 6   May 1992 and amended on 2 September 1997, read in the relevant parts as follows: § 1 – General provisions “(1) &#
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0925DEC003432096
25 septembre 2001
The text beneath read as follows:   “Wolfgang Rauter on the unfair attacks by Rezar, Kaplan and Co: how does it bother an oak tree if pigs rub themselves against it?”
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1214JUD003750812
14 décembre 2021
    The applicants complained about the ban on certain items of the Scientology literature under Articles 9 and 10 of the Convention, which read as follows: Article 9 “1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0718JUD003432096
18 juillet 2002
The text beneath read as follows:   “Wolfgang Rauter on the unfair attacks by Rezar, Kaplan and Co: how does it bother an oak tree if pigs rub themselves against it?” 11.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1009JUD002972311
9 octobre 2012
    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 10 READ IN THE LIGHT OF ARTICLE 11 OF THE CONVENTION 13.
ECLI:CEDH:002-7254
Law – Article 10 read in the light of Article   11: As the applicant was a trade-union leader Article   10 was interpreted in light of Article   11 of the Convention.
ECLI:CEDH:002-1742
22 janvier 2009
Violation of Art. 9 read in the light of Art. 11;No violation of Art. 6;No violation of P1-1;No violation of Art. 13;Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage - reserved
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0122JUD000041203
    The relevant constitutional provisions read as follows.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0131JUD000137714
31 janvier 2023
nature of the Elle-Ayat group was not disputed at the national level, the complaint about the decision to ban its activity must be examined from the standpoint of Article   9 of the Convention, read
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1025JUD001802705
25 octobre 2012
    At a hearing on 18 May 2000, the court read out J.G.’s statement of 18 January 2000.
1ère Chambre civile
6708c003445a086e2bcedb2f
10 octobre 2024
Par courriel du 29 septembre 2023, la SELARL Bourgeois Rezac Mignon a saisi la bâtonnière du conflit.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0718JUD004037710
18 juillet 2017
He referred to Articles 10 and 11 of the Convention, which in the relevant parts read as follows: Article 10 “1.     Everyone has the right to freedom of expression.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0117JUD005461111
17 janvier 2023
Violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of peaceful assembly) read in the light of Article 10 - (Art. 10) Freedom of expression-{general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0326JUD005307518
26 mars 2026
    These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article   10 of the Convention, read in the light of Article 9 .    remaining complaints 12.
LE PRESIDENT DE LA SECTION DU CONTENTIEUX
CETAT:CETATEXT000007837202
19 septembre 1994
REZAI X... demande au président de la section du Contentieux du Conseil d'Etat : 1°) d'annuler le jugement du 17 octobre 1992 par lequel le conseiller délégué par le président du tribunal administratif
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0323JUD004052408
23 mars 2017
Violation of Article 9 - Freedom of thought, conscience and religion (Article 9-1 - Freedom of religion) read in the light of Article 11 - (Art. 11) Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 -
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0710JUD003420206
10 juillet 2012
    There has therefore been no violation of Article 11 of the Convention, read in the light of Article 10. FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT 1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0712JUD003289513
12 juillet 2022
Page 2 sur 1410