CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV

98 résultats pour « Werner Mertens »

RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Tous
CC
CE
TA
CAA
CA
CPH
TJ
TCOM
CJUE
Prud'h.
Conv. coll.
BOFIP
IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0122DEC002282006

Admin. suprême

22 janvier 2013

22 janvier 2013

    The applicant company, Standard Medien AG, is the owner of an Internet site that publishes daily news. It was represented before the Court by Ms M.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;HEARINGS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-956833-986241

Admin. suprême

17 mars 2004

17 mars 2004

They were handed over to the Uzbek authorities on 27 March 1999.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-249870

Admin. suprême

23 mars 2026

23 mars 2026

The applicant’s related objections were dismissed accordingly.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0228DEC002196193

Admin. suprême

28 février 1996

28 février 1996

The conditions for his release, inter alia, a bank guarantee of 200.000 Dutch guilders, were lifted on 11 December 1985.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-191091

Admin. suprême

23 janvier 2019

23 janvier 2019

The applicants brought a case for additional compensation, as a result of which they were awarded a certain amount of compensation in 2007.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;HEARINGS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-68093-68561

Admin. suprême

25 mars 1999

25 mars 1999

    According to the Government, there were no more than two police officers present outside the police headquarters.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-233373

Admin. suprême

25 mars 2024

25 mars 2024

University, was among the signatories of a petition, entitled Academics for Peace , which was published in January 2016 and in which the Turkish government’s actions in south ‑ eastern Turkey were

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0626DEC003104296

Admin. suprême

26 juin 1996

26 juin 1996

und dann meinen zukünftigen Mann in die Schweiz nachziehen lassen werde.").

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1022DEC004942510

Admin. suprême

22 octobre 2019

22 octobre 2019

As a result of the investigation, the public prosecutor suspected that the applicants were in contact with several members of a terrorist organisation and were part of different structures of the KCK.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1022DEC002149510

Admin. suprême

22 octobre 2019

22 octobre 2019

They submit that they were unable effectively to challenge the detention order as they were denied access to the investigation file.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;HEARINGS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-68055-68523

Admin. suprême

9 novembre 1999

9 novembre 1999

  Summary of the facts   The facts as submitted by the applicant   Following incidents in Şırnak (a town in south-east Turkey) from 18 to 20 August 1992, a number of people were taken into

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1017DEC003298308

Admin. suprême

17 octobre 2017

17 octobre 2017

    The applicant, Ms Svetlana Mertena, is a Latvian national who was born in 1940 and lives in Riga. 2.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;HEARINGS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2967620-3267581

Admin. suprême

16 décembre 2009

16 décembre 2009

The benefits were granted to Emine but not to her mother, on the ground that her marriage to Ö.K. had not been legally recognised. The applicant appealed unsuccessfully against that decision.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0114REP001347087

Admin. suprême

14 janvier 1993

14 janvier 1993

seizure of another film (11 Os 165,166/85-9, Medien und Recht 1986, No. 2 p. 15).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0228REP001597490

Admin. suprême

28 février 1994

28 février 1994

  7      The Government's observations were submitted on 24 April 1992. The applicant's observations in reply were submitted on 24 June 1992.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:0412DEC001347087

Admin. suprême

12 avril 1991

12 avril 1991

seizure of another film (11 Os 165,166/85-9, Medien und Recht 1986, No. 2 p. 15).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0515DEC002253193

Admin. suprême

15 mai 1996

15 mai 1996

The applicants allege that the actual investigations were completed by the middle of 1986.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0520DEC000031919

Admin. suprême

20 mai 2025

20 mai 2025

    The Croatian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms Š. Stažnik. 3.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0517DEC002410194

Admin. suprême

17 mai 1995

17 mai 1995

  d)    In the fourth set of proceedings the Meilen District Court granted a final warrant for enforcement of the applicant's debts (55,509 SFr).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0411JUD005804911

Admin. suprême

11 avril 2017

11 avril 2017

Mertens, a lawyer practicing in Vienna. The Austrian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr H.

Source officielle

Page 2 sur 5

← PrécédentSuivant →