CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1107JUD002138004
7 novembre 2013
Violation de l'article 34 - Requêtes individuelles (Article 34 - Entraver l'exercice du droit de recours)
Page 2 sur 5528
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1016JUD002824210
16 octobre 2014
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0708JUD001209809
8 juillet 2021
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1130JUD006045013
30 novembre 2021
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0326JUD001535109
26 mars 2020
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0721JUD002326505
21 juillet 2016
The applicants complained, inter alia , under Article 34 of the Convention of a hindrance of the effective exercise of their right of individual application. 4.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0626JUD003497605
26 juin 2012
The case originated in an application (no. 34976/05) against the Republic of Hungary lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0312DEC000611119
12 mars 2026
Sârcu, Mykola Gnatovskyy , judges , and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application against the Republic of Moldova lodged with the Court under Article
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 34 OF THE CONVENTION 23. On 9 September 2014 the applicant’s representative Mr I.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0122JUD001631724
22 janvier 2026
The case originated in applications against Ukraine lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0109JUD001478409
9 janvier 2018
Both applicants relied on Article 8 of the Convention. Mr Makhlyagin also invoked Article 34 of the Convention. A. The parties’ submissions 15.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0311JUD003304008
11 mars 2021
THE LAW ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 34 OF THE CONVENTION 32.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0109JUD005648309
9 janvier 2020
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 34 OF THE CONVENTION 23.
The applicant relied on Articles 3 and 34 of the Convention.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1216JUD005248210
16 décembre 2021
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 34 OF THE CONVENTION 25. On 28 August 2014 the applicant’s representative, Mr I.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0604JUD000453606
4 juin 2019
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 34 OF THE CONVENTION 33.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0604JUD002499904
4 juin 2013
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLES 8 AND 34 OF THE CONVENTION 28.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1007JUD005457213
7 octobre 2025
The Court therefore finds that the respondent State has failed to comply with its obligations under Article 34 of the Convention. APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 27.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1011JUD001888312
11 octobre 2016
ALLEGATION OF HINDRANCE IN THE EXERCISE OF THE RIGHT OF INDIVIDUAL PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 34 OF THE CONVENTION 27.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0909JUD001373112
9 septembre 2021
COMPLIANCE WITH Article 34 OF THE CONVENTION 30.