AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0325DEC000078614
25 mars 2014
25 mars 2014
It sued the Municipality of Győr for the alleged segregation of Romani children in a local primary school.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1207JUD002431709
7 décembre 2021
7 décembre 2021
Official inquiry into the alleged ill-treatment 10.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-173702
28 avril 2017
28 avril 2017
The application concerns the alleged failure of the national authorities to discharge their obligations to protect the applicants’ right to respect for private and family life and to comply with domestic
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0527DEC005411009
27 mai 2014
27 mai 2014
On 4 May 2013 the Court gave notice to the Government of the applicant’s complaints under Articles 3 and 6 § 1 of the Convention concerning his alleged ill-treatment by prison officers, the
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-202800
12 mai 2020
12 mai 2020
The applications concern the alleged push ‑ backs of the applicants from Greece back to Turkey after they crossed the borders in Evros-Edirne area in February 2020. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-11114
7 juin 2016
7 juin 2016
.) - 52902/15 Decision 7.6.2016 [Section II] Article 13 Effective remedy Alleged inability to challenge applicants’ deportation orders: inadmissible Facts – In September 2015 the applicants – a Syrian
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-205994
15 octobre 2020
15 octobre 2020
October 2020 Published on 2 November 2020 SECOND SECTION Application no. 18815/18 Abdullah SAÇAK against Turkey lodged on 11 April 2018 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the alleged
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0825DEC005107910
25 août 2022
25 août 2022
On the same date the applicant’s alleged heirs, represented by Ms M.A. Palmieri and Ms E.D.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-224030
6 mars 2023
6 mars 2023
On 28 September 2016 the Shevchenkivskyy District Court of Kyiv ordered the investigating authority dealing with the criminal case against the applicant to conduct an inquiry into his alleged ill-treatment
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-242192
7 février 2025
7 février 2025
February 2025 SECOND SECTION Application no. 25827/23 Metin ÜNAL against Türkiye lodged on 14 June 2023 communicated on 7 February 2025 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns an alleged
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-220226
29 septembre 2022
29 septembre 2022
CASE The application concerns the disbarment of the applicant, who was a lawyer specialised in the field of protection of human rights, on account of the statements that he made to the press on the alleged
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-192060
25 février 2019
25 février 2019
Moreover, the domestic courts did not make any comment in respect of the applicant’s argument concerning the alleged discriminatory treatment.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-111254
15 mai 2012
15 mai 2012
The parties are requested to provide all the necessary details of the applicant’s alleged removal from Freedom Square and house arrest, including the grounds for such measures, the exact nature
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-212083
9 septembre 2021
9 septembre 2021
, the allegedly unjustified pre-trial detention and the alleged lack of fairness of the proceedings by which the lawfulness of the detention was decided.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-180787
15 janvier 2018
15 janvier 2018
Was the alleged interference proportionate, that is, in pursuance of one or more legitimate aims and “necessary in a democratic society” in terms of Article 10 § 2?
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-7210
18 septembre 2012
18 septembre 2012
Romania (communicated case) - 33234/12 Article 3 Torture Alleged complicity in practice of rendition of persons to secret detention sites at which illegal interrogation methods were employed: communicated
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-237376
11 septembre 2024
11 septembre 2024
5784/20 Valentyna Zakhariyivna SERGIYENKO and Nina Andriyivna NYSHCHA against Ukraine lodged on 28 January 2020 communicated on 11 September 2024 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns alleged
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-237369
10 septembre 2024
10 septembre 2024
nos. 27526/22 and 29593/22 Oktay KAYA against Türkiye and Mehmet AVCI against Türkiye lodged on 18 May 2022 communicated on 10 September 2024 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applications concern the alleged
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-228805
11 octobre 2023
11 octobre 2023
Furthermore, was the alleged revocation decision accompanied by any transitional measures for students who had already begun their studies at that university (see, mutatis mutandis , Altınay v.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-249684
17 mars 2026
17 mars 2026
lack of access to public information and alleged lack of reasons in the domestic courts’ decisions adopted in the proceedings instituted by the applicant.
Source officiellePage 20 sur 2135