CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

42 695 résultats pour « Alefeld »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0325DEC000078614

Admin. suprême

25 mars 2014

25 mars 2014

It sued the Municipality of Győr for the alleged segregation of Romani children in a local primary school.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1207JUD002431709

Admin. suprême

7 décembre 2021

7 décembre 2021

Official inquiry into the alleged ill-treatment 10.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-173702

Admin. suprême

28 avril 2017

28 avril 2017

The application concerns the alleged failure of the national authorities to discharge their obligations to protect the applicants’ right to respect for private and family life and to comply with domestic

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0527DEC005411009

Admin. suprême

27 mai 2014

27 mai 2014

    On 4 May 2013 the Court gave notice to the Government of the applicant’s complaints under Articles 3 and 6 § 1 of the Convention concerning his alleged ill-treatment by prison officers, the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-202800

Admin. suprême

12 mai 2020

12 mai 2020

The applications concern the alleged push ‑ backs of the applicants from Greece back to Turkey after they crossed the borders in Evros-Edirne area in February 2020. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-11114

Admin. suprême

7 juin 2016

7 juin 2016

.) - 52902/15 Decision 7.6.2016 [Section II] Article 13 Effective remedy Alleged inability to challenge applicants’ deportation orders: inadmissible Facts – In September 2015 the applicants – a Syrian

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-205994

Admin. suprême

15 octobre 2020

15 octobre 2020

October 2020 Published on 2 November 2020   SECOND SECTION Application no. 18815/18 Abdullah SAÇAK against Turkey lodged on 11 April 2018 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the alleged

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0825DEC005107910

Admin. suprême

25 août 2022

25 août 2022

On the same date the applicant’s alleged heirs, represented by Ms   M.A.   Palmieri and Ms E.D.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-224030

Admin. suprême

6 mars 2023

6 mars 2023

On 28 September 2016 the Shevchenkivskyy District Court of Kyiv ordered the investigating authority dealing with the criminal case against the applicant to conduct an inquiry into his alleged ill-treatment

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-242192

Admin. suprême

7 février 2025

7 février 2025

February 2025   SECOND SECTION Application no. 25827/23 Metin ÜNAL against Türkiye lodged on 14 June 2023 communicated on 7 February 2025 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns an alleged

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-220226

Admin. suprême

29 septembre 2022

29 septembre 2022

CASE The application concerns the disbarment of the applicant, who was a lawyer specialised in the field of protection of human rights, on account of the statements that he made to the press on the alleged

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-192060

Admin. suprême

25 février 2019

25 février 2019

Moreover, the domestic courts did not make any comment in respect of the applicant’s argument concerning the alleged discriminatory treatment.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-111254

Admin. suprême

15 mai 2012

15 mai 2012

  The parties are requested to provide all the necessary details of the applicant’s alleged removal from Freedom Square and house arrest, including the grounds for such measures, the exact nature

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-212083

Admin. suprême

9 septembre 2021

9 septembre 2021

, the allegedly unjustified pre-trial detention and the alleged lack of fairness of the proceedings by which the lawfulness of the detention was decided.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-180787

Admin. suprême

15 janvier 2018

15 janvier 2018

Was the alleged interference proportionate, that is, in pursuance of one or more legitimate aims and “necessary in a democratic society” in terms of Article   10 § 2?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-7210

Admin. suprême

18 septembre 2012

18 septembre 2012

Romania (communicated case) - 33234/12   Article 3 Torture Alleged complicity in practice of rendition of persons to secret detention sites at which illegal interrogation methods were employed: communicated

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-237376

Admin. suprême

11 septembre 2024

11 septembre 2024

5784/20 Valentyna Zakhariyivna SERGIYENKO and Nina Andriyivna NYSHCHA against Ukraine lodged on 28 January 2020 communicated on 11 September 2024 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns alleged

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-237369

Admin. suprême

10 septembre 2024

10 septembre 2024

nos. 27526/22 and 29593/22 Oktay KAYA against Türkiye and Mehmet AVCI against Türkiye lodged on 18 May 2022 communicated on 10 September 2024 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applications concern the alleged

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-228805

Admin. suprême

11 octobre 2023

11 octobre 2023

Furthermore, was the alleged revocation decision accompanied by any transitional measures for students who had already begun their studies at that university (see, mutatis mutandis , Altınay v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-249684

Admin. suprême

17 mars 2026

17 mars 2026

lack of access to public information and alleged lack of reasons in the domestic courts’ decisions adopted in the proceedings instituted by the applicant.

Source officielle

Page 20 sur 2135

← PrécédentSuivant →