Hungary, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Krzysztof Wojtyczek , President,   Erik Wennerström ,   Lorraine Schembri Orland , judges

) of the European Convention on Human Rights.

{ font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 10263/16 István BALOGH against Hungary and 4 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights

GEORGESCU against Romania and 4 other applications (see appended table)   The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 21   October 2021 as a Committee composed of:  

vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 50506/15 Marian CRISTIAN against Romania and 7 other applications (see list appended) The European Court of Human Rights

It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications

{ margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .sA4BC3E2E { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 62783/13 Daniel

DA SILVA PEIXOTO against Portugal (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 7   May 2025 as a Committee composed of:   Anne Louise Bormann , President

height:1px; text-align:left } .s5FFF0A7F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:9pt } .sC36A6361 { font-family:Arial; color:#000000 } 2 FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 61482/14 Florin Daniel

judges, and Attila Teplán, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications against Hungary lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights

  9786/23) against the Republic of Poland lodged with the Court under Article   34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on 16 &#xa0

vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   SECOND SECTION DECISION Application no. 20698/25 Alexis HORVÁTH against Hungary and 9 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights

vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   SECOND SECTION DECISION Application no. 23691/25 Zoltán VÁMOS against Hungary and 9 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights

; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   SECOND SECTION DECISION Application no. 14440/25 László NAGY against Hungary and 9 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights

:center; font-size:8pt } .s2490CDBC { border-right:0.75pt solid #808080; border-left:0.75pt solid #808080; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #808080; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:

font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 34781/17 Loay Ali Asae AL DULAIMI against Romania and 25 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights

page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Published on 30 September 2024   FOURTH SECTION Application no. 38191/22 Daniel

Daniele. The applicants complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention about the length of the civil proceedings to which they were a party.

Hungary, The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Gediminas Sagatys , President ,   Stéphane Pisani,   Juha Lavapuro , judges , and Attila

and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as “the Convention”), Having regard to the report drawn up on 15 May 1996, by the European Commission of Human Rights in accordance with Article 31 of